Page 108 - Crisis Communication Practical PR Strategies
P. 108

Fraud 89
                                                                             9
                                                                            8
                                  Gather the facts


              As a first step, the expeditious gathering of facts is crucial, because
              those who speak on behalf of an organization accused of fraud need to
              quickly establish their own credibility to effectively rebut unsubstanti-
              ated charges. If the charge that the organization you represent made a
              misleading or fraudulent claim does appear to have merit, the crisis
              management team need to convey quickly and effectively how the
              problem is being (or already has been) corrected and what measures
              are being taken to see that it will not happen again. Conversely, if the
              very serious charge of fraud is unsubstantiated, a strategy to explain
              how and why must be developed quickly. Calls for a retraction from
              the party or news organization that made the charge may be appro-
              priate.
                If those in charge of crisis management find that fraud did, in fact,
              take place, they must quickly establish whether it was inadvertent (ie,
              representations made in good faith, but defeated by poor perform-
              ance or unanticipated factors) or is a more serious fraud involving
              deliberate deceit by an individual or part of the organization. This is
              crucial, because in public perception the difference between uninten-
              tionally misleading communication, on the one hand, and deliberate
              deceit on the other, is substantial and requires very different responses
              on the part of the PR crisis management team.




                                 A promise unfulfilled

                 An example of the former occurred when a home mortgage
                 company that promised to process low-interest home loan
                 applications within a specific time period was unable to keep this
                 promise because a sudden drop in interest rates created an
                 overload of loan applicants who wanted to refinance their
                 homes. A Chicago-based financial columnist, who also appears
                 regularly on local television, took up the complaints of dissatis-
                 fied applicants and began to pound the company relentlessly in
                 both print and her television commentary.
                   Fact-finding by the company quickly established that the
                 problem was widespread in the mortgage loan industry. A
                 sudden drop in interest rates had caused a surge of applications
                 among homeowners seeking to refinance their home mort-
                 gages. Title companies and other players in the home finance
                 network were also overwhelmed and most mortgage companies
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113