Page 76 - Critical Political Economy of the Media
P. 76

Paradigms of media power  55

               state censorship
               high entry costs (economic barriers to mass media production)
               media concentration
               corporate ownership
               mass market pressures (i.e. commercial incentive to maximise audiences)
               consumer inequalities (i.e. provision ‘skewed’ towards serving affluent
                consumers)
               advertising influence
               rise of public relations
               news routines and values
               unequal resources (unequal access to economic, social and ‘cultural’ capital)
               dominant discourses.

             However a further list of countervailing influences is identified:

               cultural power (intra- and inter-group influences of alternative understandings/
                values)
               state empowerment (for instance, press subsidy systems and forms of public
                broadcasting)
               media regulation
               source power (capabilities of groups, including ‘resource poor’ groups, to
                secure media exposure or access)
               consumer power
               producer power
               staff power.

             This ‘reconstituted radical perspective’ (Curran 2002: 165) offers a valuable
             toolkit for analysis. It encourages analysis of the conditions that enable media
             debate to be more open and contested as well as those that explain elite influence.
             The approach informs an analysis of media coverage of the urban left who held
             power in local government in London and other UK cities in the 1980s (Curran
             et al. 2005). This describes how an adept and comparatively well-resourced left-
             wing administration at the Greater London Council (GLC) could contest critical
             accounts with alternative frames through media access, advertising and effective
             public relations – while individual councils were less organised and able to
             challenge stories about the ‘loony left’. Vehement attacks on the GLC from
             right-wing national newspapers were not reproduced in reporting by local or
             national news on public service broadcasting (PSB), governed by rules on
             impartiality and with news agendas that were more focused on council provision.
             The authors argue that consideration of core political economic influences
             (media ownership and regulation) needs to be supplemented by consideration of
             media sources and cultural influences. The right-wing newspaper attack on the
             urban left was greatly facilitated by the hierarchical structure of power within
             the popular press, with journalistic output shaped by the influence of owners and
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81