Page 58 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 58

52 CULTURAL STUDIES

            a member of the inner circle of NYRW who went on to form the Redstockings,
            looked back on those meetings in an interview during the late 1980s:
              As the movement grew, so did the number of women whose commitment
              to the women’s liberation movement was more tenuous. Your feeling was
              that these were people who were there to stop anything from happening. I
              would not be the slightest bit surprised [to discover] that there were agents
              and reactionaries there.
                                                            (Echols, 1989:99)

            Radical feminists thus had to confront the possibility that the very meetings in
            which  discussion  of  the  conspiracy  of  patriarchy  was  on  the  agenda  were
            themselves subject to the all-too-literal conspiracies of the CIA and FBI. When
            the  Redstockings  re-formed  in  1973  (after  an  absence  of  several  years),  they
            devoted much of their energy to denouncing what they now saw as a liberal plot
            to  take  over  the  radical  feminist  movement.  The desire  to  construct  what  had
            gone wrong in the 1960s in terms of a literal, personalized conspiraey reached its
            apotheosis  when  the  Redstockings  began  to  accuse  Gloria  Steinem  and  Ms.
            magazine of being involved with the CIA (Echols, 1989; Willis, 1984). Talk of
            the  literal  surveillance  carried  out  under  COINTELPRO  (the  government’s
            conspiratorial  counter-intelligence  programme)  thus  coexisted  uneasily  with  a
            more metaphorical understanding of hegemony as a form of complicitous self-
            surveillance.
              Much  feminist  writing  of  this  time  finds  itself  caught  between  a  desire  to
            create a new set of terms, and a need to continue to appropriate the language and
            ideas of an older, more literal and more male-identified form of political activism.
            The problematic engagement with the language of conspiracy takes place within
            a  wider  struggle  during  the  1960s  over  an  appropriate  language  for  feminism.
            Where  some  women  sought  to  expunge  all  trace  of  a  male-identified  political
            vocabulary, others enacted a satirical appropriation of that language. Injecting a
            measure  of  humour  and  anarchic  confusion  into  an  already  tense  situation  was
            the formation in the late 1960s of groups like WITCH (Women’s International
            Terrorist  Conspiracy  from  Hell)  and  Lavender  Menace.  The  formation  of
            WITCH in the summer of 1968 by Robin Morgan and Florika of NYRW can be
            read  partly  in  response  to  the  success  of  the  Yippies.  One  of  WITCH’s  first
            actions,  for  example,  was  to  put  a  ‘hex’  on  Wall  Street,  recalling  Abbie
            Hoffman’s throwing money at the Stock Exchange the previous year. WITCH’s
            formation  and  choice  of  name  was  also  an  ironic  yet  serious  allusion  to  the
            Conspiracy, aka the Chicago Seven, the group of activists who were at this time
            on  trial  before  the  House  Un-American  Activities  Committee  (HUAC)  for
            allegedly  inciting  a  riot  at  the  1968  Democratic  Convention.  The  HUAC  was
            brought back into the limelight for the first time since the McCarthy years as part
            of the government’s heavy-handed attempt to break the power of the increasingly
            militant  movement.  Referring  to  the  fact  that  the  HUAC  had  not  included  any
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63