Page 59 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 59

NAMING THE PROBLEM 53

            women in the subpoenas to appear before the Committee—a list which included
            Abbie Hoffman and the founder of the Yippies, Jerry Rubin—Ros Baxandall of
            WITCH  asked,  ‘How  come  we,  the  real  subversives,  the  real  witches,  aren’t
            being indicted?’ (Echols, 1989:97). Her question is both a demand to be taken
            seriously by the exclusive all-male club of ‘real subversives’, and an insistence
            that  the  ‘metaphorical’  conspiracy  of  feminism  would  in  the  long  run  be  more
            subversive than the macho posturings of what Baxandall referred to as the ‘boy’s
            movement’.  In  this  way,  the  rhetoric  and  rationale  of  WITCH  provided  both  a
            mocking debasement of the conspiracy mania of the masculinist New Left, and
            an  implicit  recognition  that  repressive  government  policies  were  once  again
            being mobilized under the justification of ‘counter-subversion’ in cases like the
            trial  of  the  Chicago  Seven.  Similarly,  though  most  of  their  street  actions
            consisted of merry pranksterism, WITCH were also quick to announce in a more
            serious  vein  that  ‘WITCHes  must  name  names,  or  rather  we  must  name
            trademarks and brand names’ (WITCH, 1970:545–50). Joking talk of conspiracy
            coexisted uneasily with a literal desire to name names.
              The  formation  of  Lavender  Menace  tells  a  similar  story  of  the  parodic
            appropriation of the rhetoric of conspiracy at the turn of the decade. A group of
            lesbian  feminists  staged  a  disruptive  protest  at  the  1970  Congress  to  Unite
            Women, adopting the tactic of embracing many of the accusations made against
            lesbianism  by  liberal  feminists  and  those  outside  the  movement.  They  called
            themselves  the  Lavender  Menace  in  response  to  a  comment  made  by  Betty
            Friedan  at  this  time  about  the  potential  infiltration  of  lesbians—a  ‘lavender
            menace’—within  the  women’s  movement.  Satirically  confirming  the  charges
            made  against  them,  they  declared  in  their  first  resolution  that  ‘Women’s
            Liberation is a lesbian plot’ (Echols, 1989:214–15). The formation of Lavender
            Menace served to materialize the demonological fears of feminists like Friedan,
            ensuring that, as one of their slogans put it, ‘I am your worst fears/I am your best
            fantasy’.  Within  the  feminist  movement  at  the  beginning  of  the  1970s,  then,
            groups  like  WITCH  and  Lavender  Menace  turned  the  language  of  conspiracy
            back  against  its  originators  (both  macho  revolutionaries  and  liberal  feminists),
            disrupting the distinction between the literal and the metaphorical.


                                 The conspiracy of language
            If the breakup of radical feminism towards the end of the 1960s was in part marked
            by  a  parodic  recycling  and  deflation  of  the  language  of  conspiracy,  the
            emergence  of  cultural  feminism  in  the  1970s  was  caught  up  in  an  inflationary
            circuit of literalness which saw the notion of patriarchy as a conspiracy solidified
            into factual statement. And whereas some radical feminists had countenanced the
            possibility  that  women  could  be  conditioned  (brainwashed)  into  collaboration
            with  patriarchal  institutions,  cultural  feminists  maintained  the  position  that  all
            men are entirely guilty of creating a conspiracy to control women, who are all
            innocent victims.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64