Page 150 - Cultural Studies of Science Education

8 Moral–Ethical Character and Science Education 127

FDA statement regarding glofish. (2003, December 9). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health
and Human Services. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/
DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/
ucm161437.htm
FDA’s response to public comments. (2009, June 25). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health
and Human Services. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/
DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/
ucm113612.htm
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of sociosci-
entific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Teacher
Education, 31, 279–296.
Gong, Z., Wan, H., Tay, T. L., Wang, H., Chen, M., & Yan, T. (2003). Development of transgenic
fish for ornamental and bioreactor by strong expression of fluorescent protein in the skeletal
muscle. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 308, 58–63.
Gong, Z., He, J., Ju, B., Lam, T. J., Xu, Y., & Yan, T. (2006). Chimeric gene constructs for genera-
tion of fluorescent transgenic ornamental fish. United States Patent, 7(135), 613.
Green, T. F. (1988). Voices: The educational formation of conscience. Notre Dame: University of
Notre Dame Press.
Kapuscinski, A. R. (2005). Current scientific understanding of the environmental biosafety of
transgenic fish and shellfish. Science and Technical Review, 24, 309–322.
Martusewicz, R. A. (2005). Eros in the commons: Educating for eco-ethical conscientiousness in
a poetics of place. Ethics, Place & Environment, 8, 331–348.
Mueller, M. P. (2008). Ecojustice as ecological literacy is more than being “green!”. Educational
Studies, 44, 155–166.
Mueller, M. P. (2009). Educational reflections on the “ecological crisis”: Ecojustice, environmen-
talism and sustainability. Science & Education, 18, 1031–1056.
Mueller, M. P., & Bentley, M. L. (2009). Environmental and science education in developing
nations: A Ghanaian approach to renewing and revitalizing the local community and ecosys-
tems. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 53–63.
Mueller, M.P., & Tippins, D.J. (2010). Citizen science, ecojustice, and science education:
Rethinking an education from nowhere. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.),
Second international handbook of science education (pp. 00–00). New York: Springer.
Mueller, M. P. (personal observation, 2009, June 15) noted that employees at pet stores in Atlanta,
Georgia, address how glofish sales have rapidly increased for teachers and parents without
much conversation around the implicit implications of GMOs for society.
Muir, W. M., & Howard, R. D. (1999). Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when
transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesis. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 13853–13856.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for
practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1–42.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscien-
tific decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112–138.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscien-
tific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391.
Scientists Working Group on Biosafety. (1998). Manual for assessing the ecological and human
health effects of genetically engineered organisms. Edmonds: The Edmonds Institute.
Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy: The plunder of knowledge and nature. Boston: South End Press.
Singer, P. (2000). Writings on an ethical life. New York: Ecco Press.
Snekser, J. L., McRobert, S. P., Murphy, C. E., & Clotfelter, E. D. (2006). Aggregation behaviour
in wildtype and transgenic zebrafish. Ethology, 112, 181–187.
Stokstad, E. (2002). Engineered fish: Friend or foe of the environment? Science, 297,
1797–1799.