Page 151 - Cultural Studies of Science Education

128 M.P. Mueller and D.L. Zeidler

US Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Regulation of genetically modified ani-
mals containing heritable recombinant DNA constructs (CVM GFI #187). Rockville, MD:
Center for Veterinarian Medicine.
van Eijck, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). Keeping the local local: Recalibrating the status of science
and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in education. Science Education, 91, 926–947.
Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through
scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1387–1410.
White, R. M., Sessa, A., Burke, C., Bowman, T., LeBlanc, J., Ceol, C., et al. (2007). Transparent
adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis. Cell Stem Cell, 2, 183–189.
Wilson, E. O. (2002). The future of life. New York: Vintage Books.
Yorktown Technologies. (2008). GloFish® fluorescent fish ethical principles. Retrieved August 3,
2009, from http://www.glofish.com/ethics.asp
Yorktown Technologies. (2009a). It’s cold outside: Exploring the effects of temperature on
GloFish® activity. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://www.glofish.com/classroom.asp
Yorktown Technologies. (2009b). Biotech animals: Science, benefits, risk & public sentiment.
Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://www.glofish.com/classroom.asp
Zeidler, D. L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy
gap. Science Education, 68, 411–419.
Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific
issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In
D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in sci-
ence education (pp. 7–38). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: Conscience,
character and care. In S. Erduran & M. Pilar Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in
science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 201–216). The
Netherlands: Springer Press.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views:
Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education,
86, 343–367.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-
based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S. & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judg-
ment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 74–101.