Page 412 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 412

33  “What Is Ours and What Is Not Ours?”                        387

            inclusive space that may help to incorporate multiple knowledge systems in math-
            ematics education programs.
              The second section begins with Bal’s composite story of his interactions with
            professors  who  subscribe  to  the  philosophy  of  foundationalism  as  an  orienting
            perspective  of  mathematics  education  programs.  Via  an  open  letter  to  the  story
            character, Dr. Authority, we deconstruct the disempowering posture of foundation-
            alism, especially its ideological and epistemological contribution towards decon-
            textualism  as  an  exclusive  and  invisible  framework  for  mathematics  education.
            More so, we explore possibilities for challenging an extreme form of foundationalism
            by introducing a healthy scepticism that opens up a space for conceiving a peda-
            gogical vision of cultural inclusivity in which local and global knowledge systems
            can flourish interdependently.
              This process of writing as inquiry (Richardson and St Pierre 2005) draws on a
            range of contemporary theories of education – philosophy of mathematics, postco-
            lonialism, transformative education – for illuminating the decontextualised pos-
            ture  of  mathematics  education  in  Nepal.  We  apply  fallibilistic  views  of  the
            philosophical nature of mathematics to challenge the longstanding absolutist view
            embedded in mathematics education. Postcolonialism, a complex discourse useful
            for generating an inclusive and justice-oriented vision for education in transitional
            societies,  enables  us  to  explore  competing  political  interests  and  perspectives,
            thereby working towards an inclusive vision of culturally contextualised mathe-
            matics education. Similarly, the theoretical perspective of transformative edu-
            cation  serves  as  a  timely  reminder  to  foreground  the  purpose  of  mathematics
            education as the cultivation of selfhood and the development of full human capital
            informed by multiple knowledge systems arising from people’s cultural practices
            and aspirations.
              ***



            FAREWELL TO UNHEALTHY GLOBALISATION:
            IMAGINING AN INCLUSIVE GLOBALISATION

              “Being  There:  We  Need  A  Globally  Justifiable  Teacher  Education!”  –
            Reminder of a Painful Moment(s)

              “Namaste Sir,” I greet with a usual smile, “Are you available for our meeting,
            now?”
              “Oh..., we have a meeting? I have totally forgotten this,”bemused Dr. Director
            admits his forgetfulness, looking at the photocopy machine purposelessly. “Sir, I
            handed a document to you last week. Have you gone through it by any chance?”
            I persuade Dr. Director to focus on the issue that I want to discuss with him.
              We do not speak for about a minute as Dr. Director looks for the document. I sit
            quietly, waiting for him to find my draft proposal for launching a 2-year mathemat-
            ics teacher education program for secondary schoolteachers. “Well, yes I found it.
            I have made some notes here, by the way. It means that I have gone through it. Give
   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417