Page 256 - Culture Media Language Working Papers in Cultural Studies
P. 256

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AT THE CENTRE 245

            is of an illustrative nature. We hope to indicate through it areas of importance in
            any attempt to approach literary production in this way.
              We would argue that women’s position in the family is a necessary starting-
            point for  any analysis  of their relation  to other  social  institutions  and to the
            sphere of literary production. While we ourselves would not see the family as a
            natural, given object  of study  but  rather  as an institution socially structured
            through a  range  of  ideological practices, it is  important to examine how the
            family was seen in the thirties.
              The nuclear family was ideologically constructed as the natural basic unit of
            social organization. Whether we looked at the ideology of the Conservative Party
            or at that of the Labour Party, we found women’s position to be over-determined
            by an  unquestioned primary location  of  women within the  nuclear family.
            Although legally equal to men as citizens after the granting of full adult suffrage
            in 1928, they were seen as having a different role to play from men and were subject
            to discrimination as women irrespective of whether, in the aftermath of the First
            World War, they were  able to marry and have children.  Women’s  primary
            location was often, and was always seen to be, in the family. The effects of this
            were manifold: for example, inequality in education, pay and employment. In
            1931 domestic service still provided a quarter of all employment for women. The
            conditions of employment for these women in waged work in the personal sphere
            of the home (albeit not their own home) highlighted the ideological contradiction
            between and within waged work and housework, which women ‘naturally’ did
            without need for recompense. For example, although kitchen maids were trained
            in government training centres to alleviate unemployment, they were not covered
            by the national insurance scheme and were thus excluded from unemployment
            benefit.
              We found another example of the over-determining ideological importance of
            women’s primary location within the home in the panic which the fall in the birth
            rate provoked and its direct effect on the demands made on women. In 1933 the
            birth rate touched its lowest point in any peacetime year before or since. It might
            be expected that fewer pregnancies and the reduced burden of child care would
            begin to give women more freedom outside the home. Instead of this, MPs began
            to demand  that women return to their  duty,  to  provide  ‘citizens of the  right
                                                   56
            breed’ for ‘the countries of the British Empire’.  Similarly, the publication of
            Twilight of Parenthood by Dr Enid Charles in 1934, arguing that the decline in
            the birth rate was a threat to national security, caused widespread concern. In
            these debates on women’s role from the perspective of eugenics we can glimpse
            the continuation of the ideological nexus connecting the family, the nation and
            the Empire, and the subordination of women with that of other races and nations.
              By the mid thirties this panic had virtually silenced arguments about the
            importance of birth control. There was a concurrent shift towards pressure for
            family allowance schemes (that is, better provision for child rearing) and there
            were developments in education for ‘scientific motherhood’  and domestic
            science.
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261