Page 154 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 154

144 CONTROL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRIES
            relationship between domestic demand and domestic production assumed by the
            idea of ‘consumer sovereignty’.


                              SELECTIVE INCORPORATIONS
            Nevertheless, historical and action-adventure series do command large domestic
            audiences and regularly feature in the ten most popular programmes. Similarly,
            the formula of crime, sex, sport and scandal employed by the Sun does attract a
            mass readership. Does this  mean  then that  these  products are an  accurate
            reflection of popular consciousness and popular culture? The answer is ‘no’, not
            entirely. As Raymond Williams (1979) has pointed out, the popular media work
            by incorporation rather than imposition. They pick up particular elements within
            working-class culture, transform them into pleasurable products and offer them
            back to workingclass  audiences. This process  of selection  works unevenly,
            however. Recent studies have convincingly shown that popular consciousness is
            both complex and contradictory (see, for example, Nichols and Armstrong, 1976
            and Davis, 1979). There is ample evidence that British working-class culture is
            saturated  with sexism,  fatalism, admiration  and  affection for royalty and the
            aristocracy, and a deep-seated distrust of politicians, intellectuals and foreigners.
            At the same time it  also  contains a  powerful  critique of  capitalism organized
            around a grass-roots socialist tradition. However, the need to attract and keep
            large, politically heterogeneous audiences means that the popular media tend to
            play safe and pick up the conservative rather than the radical strands in popular
            culture. Hence the structural opposition between Capital and Labour is regularly
            transformed into a series of political opposition between ‘them’ and ‘us’; citizens
            versus bureaucrats; the moderate majority versus the militant minority; the law
            abiding versus  the deviant; Britain versus its enemies. As  a result,  critique  is
            incorporated into a diffuse  kind  of populism that  can be  easily  mobilized in
            defence of the  status quo.  The relationship between popular ideologies  and
            popular media output is therefore more usefully viewed as partial and incomplete
            rather than distorted.


                                      CONCLUSION
            This chapter has set out to review the major approaches to the location of control
            over the mass communications systems of the advanced western societies and to
            highlight some of the problems with their organizing concepts and supporting
            evidence. In particular, I have tried to  show  how  the central divisions in the
            literature  are  rooted  in broader and more fundamental divisions between
            ‘theories of capitalism’ and ‘theories of industrial society’ and between models of
            action and power and models of structure and determination. I have also tried to
            suggest that  the central issues raised  by these conflicts remain open both
            theoretically and empiricially.  Consequently, I have been  more  concerned to
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159