Page 219 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 219

CULTURE, SOCIETY AND THE MEDIA 209
            papacy  possessed the moral authority to  undermine  its  opponents,  without
            possessing the military means to conquer them. Consequently, the papacy was
            forced to rely upon others to take up arms on its behalf, and this sometimes led to
            a positive incitement of fissiparous elements opposed to the nation-building,
            centralizing strategies of medieval monarchies. Thus, the  papacy played a
            leading  part in deliberately provoking feudatories  to oppose the German
            monarchy  during  the long drawn-out conflict over control of ecclesiastical
            appointments, thereby contributing to the growing instability of Germany and
            North Italy in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.
              The development of new communications under ecclesiastical control had a
            destabilizing impact in another, more indirect way. The ecclesiastical hierarchy
            exploited its control over medieval media to build up monarchical power, which
            provoked a feudal reaction throughout medieval Europe. Although the initiative
            often came from medieval rulers, they found in the clergy willing and skilled
            agents in the ideological  reconstruction of  their authority, partly because the
            traditional feudal conception of kingship, and the indigenous northern European
            traditions from which it derived, constituted a powerful negation of the ideology
            and new social order which  the ecclesiastical authorities sought to impose.
            According to papal ideology, you will recall, all power descended from God and
            was institutionalized in the form of law-giving by divinely appointed monarchies
            under the jurisdiction of the papal emperor with absolute authority  over the
            children of God. But according to indigenous feudal tradition,  all power
            ascended from below: the monarch was not an absolute ruler, but the first amongst
            equals bound by the reciprocal obligations of the feudal contract and constrained
            by  natural law enshrined in custom.  The  early medieval institution of  the
            monarchy was thus a functioning denial of the impersonal ecclesiastical order
            which the papacy proclaimed, the embodiment  of an  older, oral  ideological
            tradition that directly challenged the premises of papal ideology.
              The ecclesiastical hierarchy sought to refashion the institution of the monarchy
            through learned tracts, sermons, official pronouncements, liturgical symbolism
            and ritual. Thus, numerous  innovations were made in royal coronation
            ceremonies,  for instance, during the period A.D. 400–1300, in an  attempt  to
            suppress the traditional feudal conception of kingship and establish in its place a
            divine-right monarchy whose power derived through the mediation of the church
            (Kantorowicz, 1957; Ullmann, 1969, 1975 and 1978). The person of the monarch
            was deliberately invested with sacred magic  properties,  with  the result that
            throughout much of Europe  the superstition  developed that kings could  cure
            scrofula merely by  touching its victims. Even  armed resistance to  the king,
            unless  he was deposed by  the Church, was  defined by clergy as an act of
            sacrilege against the Lord’s anointed. In addition to reinterpreting the legitimacy
            of  the monarchy, the clergy also played a central role in  developing court
            administrations as effective agencies of authority.
              This  concerted attempt to transform the  position of  medieval  monarchs in
            accordance with the interests and ideology of the ecclesiastical order posed a
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224