Page 242 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 242

9

               The political effects of mass communication

                   JAY G.BLUMLER AND MICHAEL GUREVITCH









            Public concern about mass communication is chiefly focused on the potential
            effects of  mass  media  content  on audience members. Parents are  anxious to
            protect their impressionable children from the assumed consequences of
            exposure to extensive  portrayals  of ‘sex  and violence’ on television;
            selfappointed guardians of public morality set themselves  up as  watchdogs,
            aiming to shield society from the pernicious  influence of less savoury media
            materials; spokesmen of numerous institutions, interest groups and social causes
            —ranging from  the police to trade unions, industry, women’s  liberation,  the
            elderly, racial minorities, etc.—often rail against broadcast and press distortion
            or neglect of their affairs; politicians seem to think that ten minutes ‘on the box’
            are worth dozens of hours on the  hustings; advertising agencies make a
            handsome livelihood out of their clients’ faith in the persuasive efficacy of the
            media. Underlying all these reactions is a common assumption: that the mass
            media do indeed have considerable influence over their audiences; that in this
            sense they are powerful. It could appear self-evident, therefore, that a priority
            task  of communication  research should be  to study  the  effects on people’s
            outlook on the world of the large amounts of time they spend watching television,
            listening to the  radio, going  to the movies and reading newspapers  and
            magazines.
              Among academics, however, the claims to respect of media effects enquiry are
            nowhere near so  straightforward. Although some communication scholars,
            particularly those based in the United States, are heavily committed to this line
            of research, others tend to scorn it as misguided or unenlightening. As a result,
            media effects research is probably the most problematic sub-area of the field, as
            well as the one which has changed course most often over the years, partly in
            response to the ebb and flow of debate over its merits. This chapter, which deals
            with the political effects of mass communication, is accordingly shaped by the
            four-fold aim of introducing readers to:
              1. Some sources of conflicting evaluations of media effects research as such;
              2. the main phases in the historical evolution of different ways of investigating
            and interpreting media effects in politics;
              3. some key examples of recent empirical work on such effects; and
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247