Page 300 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 300

290 CULTURE, SOCIETY AND THE MEDIA
            conspiracy that  was maintained by  such tricks of  the  trade as simply  not
            mentioning the fact that the planes which bombed Guernica had been supplied by
            the Luftwaffe (although The Times had printed this information—see Aldgate,
            1979, pp.  159–60). Similarly, Aldgate  records that  the existence  of  the
            International Brigade was scarcely ever acknowledged and that, when it was—as
            in a 1937 Paramount newsreel—it was only to suggest that such Brigades
            consisted wholly of the unemployed, thereby suggesting that the volunteers who
            went to Spain did so out of necessity rather than out of principle, and that, once
            in Spain, they were used for road making rather than for fighting, none of which
            was true. Perhaps more  important,  however, was the way  in which—quite
            contrary to historical  record—several newsreels insinuated that it was the
            republican  rather than the insurgent forces which  were  responsible for the
            disorder in Spain. Commenting on the contrasting ways in which the republican
            and insurgent forces were typically represented—the former  as un-uniformed,
            apparently ill-disciplined and, not infrequently, engaged in church burnings (some
            of which were clearly stage-manged) or other acts of desecration; the latter as
            neat, orderly, professional and disciplined, usually associated with symbols of
            traditional Spain—Aldgate remarks:

              All in  all,  despite the fact  that the  Nationalists constituted a  rebel,
              Insurgent  army,  it takes little effort  to conclude  that the imagery
              surrounding it is that of traditional, conservative Spain, fighting to preserve
              its heritage. While the duly elected Republican Government is presented as
              maintaining an undisciplined army bent upon destruction and upheaval.
              (Aldgate, 1979, pp. 116–17)

            To return to Orwell, his concern—and his indignation—were more particularly
            exercised  by the role played by the Communist Party press in  mediating the
            Spanish Civil War to the international labour movement, and this, in turn, can
            only be understood in terms of the opposition between Stalinist and Trotskyist
            policies at the time. Trotsky’s prognosis of the situation in Spain was clear (see
            Trotsky, 1973). He recommended that the workers’ committees in the army and
            industry should  be  built on so as to create Soldiers and  Workers’ Councils
            capable of posing a serious alternative to the Cortes (or parliament) as a form for
            the organization of state power. He further urged that the war should be pursued
            as a revolutionary war, waged both to defend and extend the socialist ground
            already won in the republican camp, and that such socialist gains—particularly
            the virtual abolition of land ownership—should be extensively publicized in a
            propaganda war aimed  at both undercutting Franco’s support  among the
            peasantry in the territory he occupied and deepening, extending and developing
            the support offered  Spanish  workers  by the international labour  movement.
            Above all, whilst advocating that communists should co-operate with bourgeois,
            anarchist and socialist forces in defence of the Republic, Trotsky recommended
            that the communist forces in Spain should at all times retain their organizational,
   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305