Page 128 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 128

I, We, and They  107

        sarily be inferred as an approval, since it is used to maintain the line of
        communication: “yes, I heard you” is the meaning it has in Japan.
            In individualist cultures, on the other hand, speaking one’s mind is a
        virtue. Telling the truth about how one feels is characteristic of a sincere
        and honest person. Confrontation can be salutary; a clash of opinions is
        believed to lead to a higher truth. The effect of com mun ications on other
        people should be taken into account, but it does not, as a rule, justify chang-
        ing the facts. Adult individuals should be able to take direct feedback con-
        structively. In the family, children are instructed that one should always

        tell the truth, even if it hurts. Coping with conflict is a normal part of
        living together as a family.
            A former Dutch missionary in Indonesia (a country with an IDV of 14
        and a rank of 70–71) told about his parishioners’ unexpected exegesis of the
        following parable from the Bible: “A man had two sons. He went to the fi rst
        and said, ‘Son, go and work in the vineyard today’; he replied, ‘I will go, sir,’
        but he did not go. The man went to the second and said the same to him. He
        replied, ‘I will not,’ but afterwards he changed his mind and did go. Which
                                        23
        of the two did the will of the father?”  The biblical answer is that the last

        did, but the missionary’s Indonesian parishioners chose the first, for this son
        observed the formal harmony and did not contradict his father. Whether he
        actually went was of secondary importance. In one of Gert Jan’s classes, a

        Greek student inquired, “Were others present?” If so, the first son would,
        in the student’s opinion, have something going for him, for not shaming his
        father in public. Greece has a culture of intermediate collectivism.
            In the collectivist family, children learn to take their bearings from
        others when it comes to opinions. Personal opinions do not exist: opinions
        are predetermined by the group. If a new issue comes up on which there is
        no established group opinion, some kind of family conference is necessary
        before an opinion can be given. A child who repeatedly voices opinions

        deviating from what is collectively felt is considered to have a bad charac-
        ter. In the individualist family, on the contrary, children are expected and
        encouraged to develop opinions of their own, and a child who always only
        reflects the opinions of others is considered to have a weak character. The

        behavior corresponding with a desirable character depends on the cultural
        environment.
            The loyalty to the group that is an essential element of the collectivist
        family also means that resources are shared. If one member of an extended
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133