Page 337 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 337

302   CULTURES IN ORGANIZATIONS

        with the lightest shades and gradually move toward darker ones, postpon-
        ing the need for an overall cleaning round as long as possible.
            The design and sales manager tried to satisfy his customers in a highly

        competitive market. These fashion clothing firms were notorious for short-
        term planning changes. As their supplier, the printing company often got
        requests for rush orders. Even when these orders were small and unlikely
        to be profi table, the sales manager hated to say no; the customer might go

        to a competitor, and then the printing firm would miss out on that big order
        that the sales manager was sure would come afterward. The rush orders,
        however, usually upset the manufacturing manager’s schedules and forced
        him to print short runs of dark color sets on a beautifully clean machine,
        thus forcing the production operators to start cleaning all over again.
            There were frequent disagreements between the two managers over
        whether a certain rush order should or should not be taken into production.

        The conflict was not limited to the department heads: production person-
        nel publicly expressed doubts about the competence of the salespeople, and
        vice versa. In the cafeteria the production workers and salespeople would
        not sit together, although they had known each other for years.


        Implicit Models of Organizations

        This story describes a banal problem of a kind that occurs regularly in all
        types of organizations. As with most other organization problems, it has
        both structural and human aspects. The people involved react according
        to their mental software. Part of this mental software consists of people’s
        ideas about what an organization should be like.
            From the dimensions of national culture described in Chapters 3 through
        6, power distance and uncertainty avoidance in particular affect our thinking

        about organizations. Organizing always requires answering two questions:
        (1) who has the power to decide what? and (2) what rules or procedures will

        be followed to attain the desired ends? The answer to the first question is
        influenced by cultural norms of power distance; the answer to the second

        question, by cultural norms about uncertainty avoidance. The remaining two
        dimensions, individualism and masculinity, affect our thinking about people
        in organizations, rather than about organizations themselves.
            Power distance (PDI) and uncertainty avoidance (UAI) have been plot-
        ted against each other in Figure 9.1, and if the preceding analysis is cor-
        rect, the position of a country in this diagram should tell us something
        about the country’s way of solving organizational problems.
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342