Page 516 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 516

Notes  481

          7.  Codes used for correlations in this book follow general social science conventions.
        The lowercase letter r stands for the product moment (zero-order) correlation coef-
        fi cient. The Greek letter rho ( ) stands for the Spearman rank correlation coeffi cient.

        An uppercase R stands for a multiple correlation coefficient based on two or more vari-
        ables. Significance levels are indicated by asterisks: * beyond the 0.05 level, ** beyond


        the 0.01 level, and *** beyond the 0.001 level. Other significance levels are specifi ed
        by the letter p. The letter n stands for the number of cases in the correlation.
          8.  IMEDE (now IMD), Lausanne, see Culture’s Consequences, 2001, pp. 91 and 219.
          9. The VSM is a standard set of questions available to researchers who wish to
        include a replication of the Hofstede national culture research in their projects. The
        2008 version is the VSM08. It is accessible via geerthofstede.nl. Earlier versions were
        issued in 1982 and 1994.
          10.  Søndergaard, 1994.
          11.  Ng et al., 1982.
          12.  Hofstede & Bond, 1984.
          13.  Published in a 1987 article authored by the Chinese Culture Connection, the
        name chosen by Michael Bond for his team of twenty-four researchers. See Chapters
        3 through 7 and Hofstede & Bond, 1988.
          14.  Culture’s Consequences, 2001, pp. 503–20. The summary table on p. 520 counts

        355 significant zero-order correlations, 62 significant second-order correlations, and


        9 significant third-order correlations.
          15.  Margaret Mead in her preface to the 1959 edition of Benedict’s book Patterns
        of Culture.
          16.  The highest correlation was 0.64*** between extraversion and individualism
        (Hofstede & McCrae, 2004). See Chapter 4.
          17.  The words “in your life” suggest that what is asked for is the desired, but “a guid-
        ing principle” turns it into an abstract statement about the desirable.
          18.  Both the number of value items and the number of countries have grown over
        time. A version of Schwartz’s survey on the Internet in 2009 lists seventy-nine values.
        Schwartz & Bardi, 2001, report student samples from fifty-four countries and teacher

        samples from fi fty-six countries.
          19.  See Schwartz, 1994; Sagiv & Schwartz, 2000; Culture’s Consequences, 2001,
        p. 265. Smith, Peterson, & Schwartz, 2002, show correlations of our indexes with three

        summary dimensions computed from Schwartz’s data; all three are most strongly cor-
        related with individualism-collectivism.
          20.  House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004.
          21.  Hofstede, 2006.
          22.  An illustration is an item in the latest wave of the World Values Survey that asks
        respondents how much “democraticness” there is in their country. According to the
        answers provided by the nationally representative samples, there is more democratic-
        ness in Ghana, Vietnam, and Jordan than in any Western country, such as Switzerland,
        Germany, the United States, Sweden, or Finland.
          23.  This was empirically shown by personality psychologists McCrae, Terracciano,
        Realo, & Allik, 2008.
   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521