Page 323 - Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems
P. 323

284  Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems



                                             T i
                                  T i
                                 1 d up;t  5 1; 1 d down;t  5 1      ð11:10Þ


            11.4.2 Probabilistic constraints
            These are constraints that deal with the uncertainty of the wind power fore-
            cast. The reserves are now characterized by both the generation-load mis-
            match that may occur due to the wind power forecast error and the outages.
            We thus have that for all t 5 1, 2, 3, ..., N t ,

                                i   i i          i
                    PðP w;t Aℝ 2 P # A P  P w;t # P

                                f     inj;t      f
                     i
                               i


                    P # P i  1 R P w;t # P i                         ð11:11Þ
                     G    G;t  t        G


                               i
                    2 R i   # R P w;t # R i
                       down;t  t        up;t  ; for all ðiAZÞ $ 1 2 ε t
               The probability is meant with respect to the probability distribution of the
                                   w
            wind power vector P w Aℜ . The last constraint in (11.11) is included to
            determine the reserves R i  ; R i  as the worst case, in a probabilistic
                                  up;t  down;t
                   i
            sense, R is the power correction term. The reserves that the system operator
                   t
            will need to purchase are then determined as
                                     R up;t 5 max R i up;t           ð11:12Þ
                                            iAZ
                                   R down;t 5 max R i down;t         ð11:13Þ
                                            iAZ
            which denote the worst-case values, given all the outages, of R i  ; R i  ,
                                                                  up;t  down;t
            respectively. In (11.11) the same probability level is considered for each
            time step t 5 1,..., N t ; different probability levels per stage or a joint chance
            constraint for all stages can be captured by the proposed framework as well.
            In line with the formulation an additional AGC/LFC functionality is pro-
            posed. The system operator must monitor both the production of the tripped
            plant and the deviation of the wind power from its forecast. Thereafter, by
            using (11.1) as a look-up table the appropriate distribution vector, among
            those computed in the optimization problem, is selected as shown in
            Fig. 11.2.
               The resulting problem given by (11.10) and (11.11) is a chance-
            constrained bilinear program whose stages are only coupled due to the tem-
            poral correlation of the wind power. Further coupling among the stages can
            be obtained if a unit-commitment problem was included or ramping con-
            straints of the generating units and minimum up and down times were mod-
            eled [35]. The two major challenges faced when attempting to solve problem
            (11.3) (11.11) are as follows: the first is due to the presence of bilinear
            terms that are a result of the products of d i up;t ; d i down;t , and P G,t for iAϒ G , the
            second is owing to the presence of the chance constraint.
   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328