Page 187 - Decoding Culture
P. 187

180  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

             makes incorporation such a constant necessity .  Instead of concen­
             trating on  the  omnipresent,  insidious practices  of the  dominant
             ideology,  it attempts to understand the everyday resistances and
             evasions that make that ideology work so hard and  insistently to
             maintain itself and its values. (ibid: 20-21)

          The  conceptual  oppositions  on  which  he  is  trading  are  clear
           enough here. On the one side: forces of dominance; processes of
           incorporation; insidious practices of the dominant ideology. On the
          other side: tactics for coping; vitality and creativity; everyday resis­
           tance and evasion. Dominance, incorporation and ideology are real
           enough in Fiske's account, then, but they are not central. Capitalist
           society is the locus of cultural contradictions and individual nego­
          tiations,  and  it is these  processes that form the  focus of Fiske's
           interest. The balance tips toward individuals, cultural tactics and
           micro-politics,  and  away from  the  macro-politics  of hegemony
           theory.
             In thus examining individual creativity and tactical resistance he
          draws primarily upon de Certeau  (1984). The heart of the matter
           for  Fiske  lies  in  people's  capacity  to  make  their  popular culture
           out of the materials that the system provides. But unlike views that
           concentrate on the ways in which the system thus limits people's
           activities and conceptions, Fiske prefers to accentuate the positive
           potential of this 'production in consumption'. 'All the culture indus­
           tries  can  do,' he  observes,  'is  produce a  repertoire  of texts  or
           cultural resources' (Fiske, 1989b: 24) , as if that were trivial in com­
           parison with the creative use to which such resources will then be
           put.  His portrait is one of semiotic guerrilla warfare - a concept
           traceable back at least as far as Eco in an essay first published in
           1967 (Eco, 1987)  - in which people 'use guerrilla tactics against the
           strategies of the powerful, making poaching raids upon their texts
           or structures,  and  play constant tricks  upon the  system'  (Fiske
           1989b:  32) .  By 'reading'  texts  rather than  merely 'deciphering'





                              Copyrighted Material
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192