Page 183 - Decoding Culture
P. 183

176  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

          an approach to research  which  recognizes that all  methods for
          generating descriptive  accounts  (participant observation, ethno­
          graphic interview,  questionnaires, historical narrative,  statistical
          analysis,  etc.)  constitute  starting points,  individually  and  collec­
          tively, for explanatory analysis. That is to say, our goal should be
          to model social processes in such a way as to establish the mech­
          anisms which  underlie  observed  patterns.  If,  let us say,  survey
          research into audiences suggests a finite set of response patterns
          in relation to particular television programming,  then we  would
          seek to show that the model that we have developed of audience
          activity in, say, a class context, provisionally makes sense of those
          patterns. We  would then redescribe the situation in terms of the
          model  and  design  further  research  (perhaps  in-depth  ethno­
          graphic interviews) that would allow us to examine and refine the
          theory. And so on, in a constant interaction of accounts generated
          by diverse methodologies with attempts to make theoretical sense
          of those accounts. There is no end to this process,  of course, no
          final account, but through constant refinement,  systematic com­
          parison with alternative models and continuing reformulation we
          would  seek to maximize 'ontological  depth' - a  richer,  explana­
          tory understanding of the  patterns  that  characterize  audience
          activity.
             I  am  in agreement,  then,  with  those who  insist that we need
          empirically to examine the modes of audience activity. However, I
          do not consider that this purpose  is best  served  by exclusive or
          even  predominant  use  of  'ethnographic'  methods.  Some
          researchers clearly believe that audience ethnographies will pro­
          vide privileged access to the inner workings of television viewing.
          This is simply not the case. What they can provide - in parallel with
          other methodological approaches - are accounts of patterned activ­
          ity  that  provide  grist for  the  explanatory  mill.  Such  accounts,
          whatever the methodology used to generate them, are necessarily





                              Copyrighted Material
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188