Page 179 - Decoding Culture
P. 179

172  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE
          on an ability to understand how social actors themselves define and
          understand their own communication practices - their decisions,
          their choices  and  the  consequences  of both for their daily lives
          and  their  subsequent actions - as well  as  on the  ability  of the
          researcher  to  bring into  the  analysis  (and  even  offer  his  or her
          subjects) the benefits of more structural considerations'. In its first
          part, this passage could represent any V e �tehen-inclined research
          strategy,  any attempt to  remain  true  to  the character of actors'
          experiences of everyday life, so it is not surprising to find Morley
          invoking the father of phenomenological sociology, Alfred Schutz,
          a page or two later. In its second part, however, a more distinctive
          claim is being made about the importance of incorporating 'struc­
          tural considerations'. That immediately begs the question of what
          conceptual materials such structural considerations are composed,
          which, in turn, requires the 'ethnographer' to lay out the theory of
          structure  through  which  these  phenomena  will  be  identified.
          Structures  do  not identify themselves;  they require  conceptual
          framing. Morley's formulation clearly assumes that these concepts
          are brought to the analysis by the researcher - they do not simply
          emerge inductively from the phenomenal account.
            Two kinds of claim are being made here. One supposes that it is
          both possible and desirable to understand audience activity from
          within and  to  describe that activity  in its own terms. The other
          requires that such 'ethnographic' description be related to some
          model of structure that is used to  (re) interpret patterns of activity
          in a larger socio-cultural context. Morley's use of gender in Family
          T e levision is presumably an  instance of  such interpretation, but it
          remains untheorized in its relation to other aspects of the  struc­
          turing  environment.  Of  course,  a  radically  phenomenological
          position  would  anyway  deny the validity and  possibility of the
          second  structuring  moment  of Morley's  project,  accepting only
          accounts cast in the terms provided by the social agents involved.





                              Copyrighted Material
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184