Page 177 - Decoding Culture
P. 177

170  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE
           other similarly disposed research. First, even today we lack the the­
           oretical resources to implement Morley's project of relating active
           meaning production to the structuring restrictions imposed by cul­
           ture, although growing interest in Bourdieu's (1977, 1986) work in
           the 1990s may go some way toward remedying that lack. Secondly,
           as we know from other areas of sociology, there is a methodologi­
           cal risk with this kind of qualitative research that the provision of
           'rich description'  (Geertz,  1973) comes to  substitute for analysis;
           presentation  of the  'ethnographic'  material  becomes an  end in
           itself. Neither of these difficulties is insuperable, nor do they con­
           stitute reasons for not pursuing the project that Morley proposes.
           But they do suggest the need for more in the way of theoretical and
           methodological reflection.
             Let us begin  that process with an  apparently  straightforward
           methodological question: in what senses is Morley's and other sim­
           ilar audience research appropriately described as 'ethnography'? If
           one were  to  adopt  a strict  definition  of the  kind  that  used  to be
           accepted in, say, social and cultural anthropology, then the work of
           Morley  or Ang  (1985)  or  Buckingham  (1987)  or Gray  (1992)  or
           Radway  (1987), whatever its many virtues, would hardly count as
           ethnographic. The  classical  ethnographic  project  required  exten­
           sive  participant  observation  fieldwork  with  a  view  to  the
           researcher's total immersion in the social and cultural world of the
           subjects.  In  consequence  of this  immersion,  sometimes  over  a
           period of years, the ethnographer would then generate a thorough­
           going  description  of  the  system.  The  resulting  account  was
           naturalistic  and holistic:  the  former  in  its  assumption that it was
           possible to 'get inside' the culture and understand it from its par­
           ticipants' point of view; the latter in the ambition to offer an account
           of it as a whole system of social interaction. Some of that ambition
           does  survive  in  modern  audience  research.  Most  of  these
           researchers would wish  to  see the researched world from their





                              Copyrighted Material
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182