Page 172 - Decoding Culture
P. 172

7  The Rise o f  the


                Reader









          The cultural studies inheritance from structuralism was not simply
          a matter of new terminology, a methodological focus on significa­
          tion,  and a desire to theorize langue wherever it might be found.
          Structuralism and the various post-structuralisms were marked by
          a conceptual tension that runs like an undercurrent through the
          cultural studies project.  On the one hand,  structuralists and post­
          structuralists were  committed  to  understanding the constraints
          imposed by structures of whatever kind. But on the other hand, as
          Saussure had before them, they also recognized the social relativ­
          ity of semiotic systems, their inbuilt potential for polysemy, and the
          inventive capacities of the social agents who made creative use of
          them.  In  the  terms  that  I  borrowed  from  Giddens  (1984)  in
          Chapter 3,  structuralism had the potential to  see  culture  as both
          constraining  and  enabling.  Culture  stores  and  delivers  the
          resources that  social  agents  utilize  in  making their world  make
          sense, and in that respect sets limits, defines terms, constrains the
          character of social life.  But cultures are also  complex,  contradic­
          tory and ambiguous, open to constant reconstruction by users who
          are, by their very nature, active manipulators of cultural materials.
          Culture may indeed be a reservoir on which we draw to constitute





                              Copyrighted Material
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177