Page 90 - Decoding Culture
P. 90

SITUATI G   SUBJECTS  83
                                                   N
           of possibilities to be excavated in terms of a fluid network of codes.
           Secondly, the reader, or, rather, the process of readership, takes its
           place  at the  conceptual  heart  of the  enterprise.  I  stress  'reader­
           ship' here because the term 'reader' already hypostasizes a subject,
           an 'I' outside the text, and it is against such fixed ideas of subjec­
           tivity that Barthes and other 'post-structuralists' counterpose their
           views. Thirdly, the  attribution  of meaning  is seen  as a  constant
           process of (re)construction among the play of signifiers, texts end­
           lessly open to a plurality of readings and re-readings, none of them
           privileged as first or last. Text, subject, plurality: in these three we
           see both a denial and an extension of structuralism. A denial in the
           sense of discarding the semiological project, the goal of uncovering
           an underlying formal system which mechanistically enables social
           agents to  use  and  understand  signs. An  extension  in as much as
           texts, subjects and their conjoint plurality are constituted within the
           conceptual field  of those earlier structuralist perspectives. In that
           respect, these are indeed post-structuralist texts and subjects.
             How  does  this  move  manifest  itself  in  cultural  studies?
           Unevenly, certainly, and in the first instance very much within the
           field of film theory. We saw in Chapter 2 how film became a focus
           for those especially concerned to develop a different approach to
           popular culture to that found in traditional mass culture perspec­
           tives.  Unsurprisingly,  then,  it  was  in  relation  to  the  task  of
           theorizing film  'language' that first semiology and  then various
           post-structuralist innovations entered the English-speaking world
           of cultural studies. Peter Wollen  (1969a,  1969b)  played an impor­
           tant part in this development,  both in his own writings and in his
           influence upon the  emergence of the journal Screen  as a crucial
           locus  for theoretical  debate.  For  much  of the  1970s - but espe­
           cially  during  the  first five years  - Screen  served  as  a  channel
           through which the latest (post-) structuralist thinking was brought
           to the attention of British and American film scholarship. Not only





                              Copyrighted Material
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95