Page 303 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 303

Axiomatic Design  273


             Synergy is gained when Axiomatic Design is integrated with other
           design methodologies as needed such as design optimization methods,
           TRIZ to identify appropriate design parameters to resolve coupling,
           and probabilistic design analysis.


           Appendix 8A*: Automatic Design Theorems
           and Corollaries

           The study of most famous examples (such as Euclidean geometry,
           Newton laws, thermodynamics, and the axiomatic branch of modern
           mathematics†) of the axiomatic disciplines reveals several common
           threads. For example, Euclid’s axiomatic geometry opens with a list of
           definitions, postulates, then axioms, before proving propositions. The
           aim is to present geometrical knowledge as an ordered list of proven
           facts, a historical paradigm of disciplines with axiomatic origin.
           Newton’s laws were deliberately set up to emulate the Euclidean style.
           The laws open with a list of definitions and axioms, before proving
           propositions. While the axioms are justified empirically, consequences
           of the axioms are meant to be drawn deductively. Modern mathemat-
           ics and empirical knowledge are two streams that can be observed in
           disciplines that emerge from an axiomatic origin.
             In axiomatic design, the goal is to systematize our design knowledge
           regarding a particular subject matter by showing how particular
           propositions (derived theories and corollaries) follow the axioms, the
           basic propositions. To prove a particular proposition, we need to appeal
           to other propositions that justify it. But our proof is not done if those
           other propositions themselves need justification. Ultimately, to avoid
           infinite regress, we will have to start our proofs with propositions that
           do not themselves need justification. What sorts of propositions are not
           in need of justification? Answer: the axioms. Therefore, differentiation
           of axioms from other postulates is needed. The label “axiom” is used to
           name these propositions that are not in need of justification.
           Nevertheless, historically, various distinctions have been made
           between axioms and postulates. We will encounter two ways of draw-
           ing the distinction, one based on logical status, and the other based on
           status relative to the subject matter of the theory. Axioms are self-
           evident truths. For example, the Independence  Axiom and the



             *El-Haik (2005).
             †Axiomatic theories in modern mathematics include modern axiomatic geometry
           (Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries), Peano’s axioms for natural numbers, axioms
           for set theory, axioms for group theory, order axioms: linear ordering; partial ordering,
           axioms for equivalence relations. Not the sort of axiomatic theory we’ll be considering in
           this book.
   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308