Page 432 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 432

396   Chapter Eleven

           TABLE 11.3 Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) Detection Rating

              Detection                Likelihood of detection         Rating
           Almost certain  Design control will almost certainly detect a potential   1
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Very high      Very high chance design control will detect a potential   2
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           High           High chance design control will detect a potential   3
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Moderately high  Moderately high chance design control will detect a   4
                           potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Moderate       Moderate chance design control will detect a potential   5
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Low            Low chance design control will detect a potential cause/  6
                           mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Very low       Very low chance design control will detect a potential   7
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Remote         Remote chance design control will detect a potential   8
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Very remote    Very remote chance design control will detect a potential   9
                           cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
           Absolute       Design control will not and/or cannot detect a potential   10
           uncertainty     cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode; or
                           there is no design control



           RPN numbers are used to prioritize the potential failures. The severity,
           occurrence, and detection ratings are industry-specific and black belts
           should use their own company-adopted rating systems. Automotive
           industry ratings are summarized in Tables 11.1 to 11.3 (compiled AIAG
           ratings are shown in  Table 11.4). The software FMEA is given in
           Table 11.5, while service FMEA ratings are given in Table 11.6.
             10. Actions recommended. The DFSS team should select and man-
           age recommended subsequent actions. That is where the risk of poten-
           tial failures is high; an immediate control plan should be crafted to
           control the situation.
             Over the course of the design project, the DFSS team should
           observe, learn, and update the FMEA as a dynamic living document.
           FMEA is not retrospective, but a rich source of information for corpo-
           rate memory, including core design books. The DFSS team should doc-
           ument the FMEA and store it in a widely acceptable format in the
           company in both electronic and physical media.



           11.3 Design FMEA (DFMEA)
           The objective of DFMEA is to help the team design for Six Sigma by
           designing the failure modes out of their project. Ultimately, this objective
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437