Page 576 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 576

534   Chapter Fifteen


           ■ Midstream quality. Midstream quality (also known as  specified
             quality) requirements are usually some key design characteristics
             for the product such as dimension and strength.
           ■ Upstream quality. Upstream quality (also known as robust quality)
             is the static signal-to-noise ratio we discussed in Chap. 14; it is a
             measure of stability of a given requirement. Both midstream and
             upstream qualities are usually conducted in the process mapping
             within the DFSS algorithm.
           ■ Original quality. Original quality (also known as functional quality)
             is related to the generic function of an individual product, a class of
             product, or a branch of technology. This kind of quality is represented
             in the physical structure of the DFSS algorithm.

           Dr. Taguchi stated that in robust parameter design study, downstream
           quality is the worst choice as the performance measure. The best
           choice is the  dynamic signal-to-noise ratio, which is related to the
           input-output relationship; this is called the  “ideal function,” intro-
           duced in Chap. 6. Ideal function is specified by the generic function of
           the product or product family and is often the energy transfer related
           to a design. These kinds of functions are derived using the zigzagging
           process within the DFSS algorithm. The second best choice for system
           performance characteristic is the upstream quality, or robust quality.
           Midstream quality is an acceptable but not preferred choice.
             2. Interaction. If a dynamic S/N ratio based on ideal function is cho-
           sen as the performance characteristic in a robust parameter design
           study within the DFSS project, then the interaction between control
           factors (design parameters) is an indication of inconsistency and non-
           reproducibility; therefore, it has a harmful effect and indicates a defi-
           ciency of the design concept. However, the control factor–noise factor
           interaction can be utilized to enhance the robustness toward the influ-
           ence of noise factors.
             3. Orthogonal array. Dr. Taguchi thinks that  L 12 , L 18 , and  L 36 are
           preferred orthogonal arrays because the interactions of main effects
           are evenly confounded among all columns, and the interaction effects can
           then be considered as a part of noise in subsequent S/N study. This is
           done in pursuit of an additive transfer function (Chap. 6).
             4. Robust technology development. Dr. Taguchi and many Japanese
           industries believe that the robust parameter design should be brought
           into stage 0 (see Chaps. 1 and 5) of the product development cycle, the
           new technology development phase, by introducing noise factors and
           building robustness of the generic function of a new technology startup
           phase, thus reducing downstream hiccups in the product development
           cycle and significantly shortening product development cycle time.
   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581