Page 296 - Determinants and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics
P. 296

6.9 The Benjamin–Ono Equation  281

          Theorem. The KP equation in the form (6.8.2) is satisfied by the
          Wronskian w defined as follows:

                                         j−1
                                  w = D     (ψ i ) ,


                                         x
                                                n
          where
                                          1 2
                                ψ i = exp  b y φ i ,
                                         4 i
                                       1/2     −1/2
                                φ i = p i e  + q i e  ,
                                       i       i
                                                3
                                 e i = exp(−b i x + b t)
                                                i
          and b i , p i , and q i are arbitrary functions of i.
            The proof is obtained by replacing z by y in the proof of the first line of
          (6.7.60) with F = 0 in the KdV section. The reverse procedure is invalid. If
          the KP equation is solved first, it is not possible to solve the KdV equation
          by putting y =0.



          6.9 The Benjamin–Ono Equation


          6.9.1  Introduction
                       2
          The notation ω = −1 is used in this section, as i and j are indispensable
          as row and column parameters.
          Theorem. The Benjamin–Ono equation in the form

                     ∗   1     ∗                       ∗
                 A x A −   A (A xx + ωA t )+ A(A xx + ωA t )  =0,    (6.9.1)
                         2
                     x
          where A is the complex conjugate of A, is satisfied for all values of n by
                 ∗
          the determinant
                                     A = |a ij | n ,
          where

                                       2c i  ,  j  = i
                               a ij =  c i −c j                      (6.9.2)
                                      1+ ωθ i ,j = i
                                          2
                                θ i = c i x − c t − λ i ,            (6.9.3)
                                          i
          and where the c i are distinct but otherwise arbitrary constants and the λ i
          are arbitrary constants.
            The proof which follows is a modified version of the one given by
          Matsuno. It begins with the definitions of three determinants B, P, and Q.
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301