Page 151 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 151

120
                                 BRIEF, BUTZ, DEITCH
 by addressing why this problem was chosen as the focus of attention and
 its multiple facets. Next, we outline a very crude theory of environmen­
 tal influences on race composition by specifying a small, exemplary set
 of environmental attributes for consideration. For each attribute, we will
 attempt to trace how it might affect matters of race in organizations (e.g.,
 how the race composition of an organization's customer base might affect
 the practices it uses to recruit and select customer service personnel). After
 presenting our theoretical ideas, some of the methodological challenges
 they pose for organizational psychologists are raised. The chapter closes
 with the assertion that the theoretical lens we brought to bear on discrim­
 ination against Blacks in American organizations is applicable to other
 stigmatized groups (e.g., women and foreign workers) in other settings
 (e.g., Asia and Europe).


      WHY THE ISSUE OF RACE?

 We take on the sticky issue of race in organizations because there is a
 clear need. In a study of urban inequality in Los Angeles, almost 60% of
 Black respondents reported experiencing some form of work-related dis­
 crimination (in comparison, only 25% of Whites reported discrimination)
 (Bobo & Suh, 2000). Take these numbers to the national level, and it is
 not surprising that in fiscal year 2002, almost 30,000 allegations of racial
 discrimination were filed with the EEOC against private sector employers
 (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, April 7,2002). This be­
 ing said, however, we do acknowledge that conditions in the labor market
 and workplace have dramatically improved in the last 50 years. Prior to
 the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it was legal in much of the United States to use
 race or sex to recruit, hire, and assign jobs (Reskin, 1998). The Civil Rights
 Act and subsequent antidiscrimination legislation in the 1960s and 1970s
 made these practices illegal and spurred decreases in racial disparity, for
 example, a significant narrowing of the Black-White earnings gap (e.g., see
 Alexis, 1998; Couch & Daly, 2002).
 Despite progress, however, there is still widespread evidence that racial
 disparities persist in America's workplaces (Reskin, 1998). For instance,
 although the earnings gap has narrowed, America's Black workers are still
 grossly underpaid relative to their White counterparts (Neumark, 1999).
 In 2002, among full-time wage and salary workers, the median weekly
 earnings of Blacks ($498) was much lower than those of Whites ($624);
 and the earnings gap was especially pronounced for Black males whose
 median was a mere 74.5% of that of White males (U.S. Dept. of Labor,
 2002). Furthermore, although jobless rates declined dramatically between
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156