Page 280 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases

247
10. WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION
behind the guise of blaming unfavorable evaluations or decisions on one's
impairment.
We are optimistic about the future progression of research on disability
discrimination. In the eight years since our last review of this literature
(Stone & Colella, 1996), there has been a steady stream of research that has
taken off in new directions including fieldwork, understanding interaction
dynamics, examining the accommodation scenario, and examining ways in
which disability discrimination may be eliminated. We expect this research
to continue and hope that our suggestions and observations here serve to
fuel that research.
REFERENCES

Ainsley, S. C. (1988). Aging and new vision loss: Disruptions here and now. Journal of Social
Issues, 44, 79-94.
Alberstons Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 1999.143 F.32 1228,119 S. Ct. 2162.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336,42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. (1990).
Bailey, J. W. (1984). Evaluation of a task partner who does or does not have a physical disability:
Response amplification or sympathy effect? Rehabilitation Psychology, 36,99-110.
Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to
request an accommodation: Can requesters' beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities
Act? The Academy of Management Review, 26,85-99.
Baldwin, M. L. (1999). The effects of impairments on employment and wages: Estimates from
the 1984 and 1990 SIPP. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17,7-27.
Baldwin, M. L., Zeager, L. A., & Flacco, P. R. (1993). Gender differences in wage losses from
impairments. The Journal of Human Resources,29,865-887.
Benson v. Northwest Airlines. 62 F.3d 1108,1114 (8th Circuit, 1995).
Berkowitz, M., & O'Leary, P. K. (2000). Persons with disabilities at work. The Atlantic City
gaming casinos. Journal of Disability Policy Studies,11,152-160.
Blalock, J. W. (1981). Persistent problems and concerns of young adults with learning disabil­
ities. In W. Cruickshank & A. Silver (Eds.), Bridges to tomorrow: Vol. 2. The best of ACLD
(pp. 35-55). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Blanck, P. D. (1997). The economics of employment provisions of the American with Disabil­
ities Act: Part I—Workplace accommodations. DePaul Law Review, 46,877-914.
Bordieri, J. E., & Drehmer, D. E. (1986). Hiring decisions for disabled workers: looking at the
cause. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16,197-208.
Bordieri, J. E., & Drehmer, D. E. (1987). Attribution of responsibility and predicted social
acceptance of disabled workers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30,218-226.
Bordieri, J. E., & Drehmer, D. E. (1988). Causal attribution and hiring recommendations for
job applicants with lower back pain. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 32,140-148.
Bordieri, J. E., Drehmer, D. E., & Cominel, M. E. (1988). Attribution of responsibility and hiring
recommendations for disabled job applicants. Rehabilitation Psychology, 30,218-226.
Bordieri,J. E., Drehmer, D. E., &Taricone, P. F. (1990). Personnel selection bias for job applicants
with cancer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20,244-253.
Bowman, J. T. (1987). Attitudes towards disabled persons: Social distance and work compe­
tence. Journal of Rehabilitation, 53,41-44.