Page 493 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 493

460  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries


             in such cases, the flow out of the vent is subsonic. However, in the case of quite strong
             process units, such as certain types of mills, the pressure ratio PJP0 during the first
             part of  the venting process may exceed the critical value, and the sonic flow theory
             applies.
               The following sections include only venting theories that were developed specifically
             for dust explosions.However, as long as the dust cloud is regarded as a combustiblecon-
             tinuum, there is little difference between the theoretical treatment of a dust and a gas
             explosion, apart from the dust dispersion and initial turbulenceproblem. Therefore, ref-
             erence should be made at this point to some central publications on gas explosion vent-
             ing, including Yao (1974);Anthony (1977/1978);Bradley and Mitcheson (1978a, 1978b);
             McCann, Thomas, and Edwards (1985); Epstein, Swift, and Fauske (1986); and Swift
             and Epstein (1987).



             6.5.2
             THEORY BY MAISEY

             An early attempt to develop a partial theory of  dust explosion venting was made by
             Maisey (1965a). As a starting point, he used a simple theory for laminar gas explosion
             development in a closed spherical vessel, with ignition at the center. The radial laminar
             flame front speed was, as a first approximation,assumed to be a constantfor a given fuel.
             For dusts, it was estimated from Hartmann bomb test data (see Chapter 7). A central
             assumption was that the maximum pressure in a closed-bombtest is proportional to the
             laminar radial flame speed. However, Maisey fully appreciated that, in the Hartmann
             bomb test, as in any closed-bombdust explosiontest, the dust cloud is turbulent and that
             turbulence increasesthe flame speed. He suggested that Hartmann bomb test data be con-
             verted to equivalent turbulent flame speeds, correspondingto the turbulence level in the
             test. However,because this turbulence level  is probably higher than in dust clouds in most
             industrial plants, Maisey recommended a reduction of this equivalent Hartmann bomb
             flame speed, according to the actual industrial situation.
               The second main part of the venting problem, the flow of gas and dust out of the vent
             opening, was not treated theoretically by Maisey, who instead used various experimen-
             tal results to derive semi-empiricalcorrelationsbetween maximum vented explosion pres-
             sure and vent area for various enclosure volumes and closed-bomb flame speeds.



             6.5.3
             THEORY BY HEINRICHAND KOWALL

             Heinrich and Kowall(1971), followingthe philosophy outlinedin Section 6.5.1 and con-
             sidering subsonic flow, arrived at the following expression for the pressure equilibrium
             at the maximum pressure Pred:
   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498