Page 312 - Dynamics and Control of Nuclear Reactors
P. 312

314    APPENDIX F State variable models and transient analysis




                                       y


                                               y4

                                               y3
                                               y2

                                               y1
                                                    y0


                                                 x0        x1        x2         x3         x4  x
                         FIG. F.1
                         Grids and nodes for a two-dimensional finite difference mesh with n¼m¼4.
                         Adapted from R.L. Burden, J.D. Faires, Numerical Analysis, third ed, PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston, 1985.


                            Tx i +1 , y j  2Tx i , y j + Tx i 1 , y j  Tx i , y j +1  2Tx i , y j + Tx i , y j 1
                                                      +
                                          2                           2           ¼ qx i , y j
                                       ð ΔxÞ                       ð ΔyÞ
                                                                                        (F.62)
                         For i¼1, 2, …, (n-1) and j¼1, 2, …, (m-1) with appropriate boundary conditions.
                            Eq. (F.62) is rewritten as a difference equation (with indices i and j) in the form.
                            "        #
                                  2                          2
                              Δx                         Δx                    2
                           2       +1 T i, j   T i +1, j + T i 1, j    T i, j +1 + T i, j 1 ¼  Δxð  Þ qx i , y j  (F.63)
                              Δy                         Δy
                         For i¼1, 2, …, (n-1) and j¼1, 2, …, (m-1). For the case of n¼m¼4, the boundary
                         conditions are given by the following.

                                               T 0, j ¼ gx 0 , y j , forj ¼ 0,1,2,3,4

                                               T n, j ¼ gx n , y j , forj ¼ 0,1,2,3,4
                                                                                        (F.64)
                                               T i,0 ¼ gx i , y 0 Þ, fori ¼ 1,2,3
                                                    ð
                                               T i,m ¼ gx i , y m Þ, fori ¼ 1,2,3
                                                    ð
                         Note that the T i,j values are approximations to the actual values T(x i ,y j ) in both
                         Eqs. (F.63) and (F.64). Also note that each Eq. (F.63) involves four adjacent nodes
                         with respect to the central node (x i ,y j ). This approximation is often called the central
                         difference method.
                            Using the boundary conditions defined by Eq. (F.64), Eq. (F.63) represents a set
                         of (n-1) x (m-1) linear equations in (n-1) x (m-1) unknowns. The matrix represen-
                         tation has the form.
                                                        A T ¼ q                         (F.65)

                         Matrix A is sparse with elements in a diagonal band; T is the vector of temperature
                         values at all nodes except the boundary values, and q is a vector of known energy
   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317