Page 524 - Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
P. 524

0593_C14_fm  Page 505  Tuesday, May 7, 2002  6:56 AM





                       Stability                                                                   505


                        By inspection of Eqs. (14.6.87) and (14.6.88), we see that the first condition of Eq. (14.6.86)
                       is satisfied if  φ ˙  0  is sufficiently large. The second condition of Eq. (14.6.86), however, will
                                       ˆ
                                                        ˆ
                                       A
                                                       C
                       not be satisfied if   is positive and   is negative independent of the magnitude or sign
                       of  φ ˙ 0 . Thus, for all pivoting speeds, the disk with the rim mass in the lower position is
                       unstable.
                                                                             ˆ
                        Finally, observe that with m = 0, Eq. (14.6.89) shows that  C  = 0, thus stability can be
                                         ˆ
                                        B
                       attained by having   > 0. This in turn will occur if:
                                                        φ > (       )
                                                         ˙ 2
                                                         0   45)(gr                           (14.6.90)
                       which is identical to Eqs. (14.6.65) and (14.5.38).




                       14.7 Discussion: Routh–Hurwitz Criteria
                       Recall that in the previous section we solved the governing equations for the disturbance
                       motion by seeking to simultaneously solve the equations. Consider again Eqs. (14.6.50)
                       and (14.6.41):

                                                            ψ +
                                                      a θ +  a ˙ *  a θ =  0                   (14.7.1)
                                                       ˙˙*
                                                                   *
                                                      1     2     3
                                                       ψ +
                                                     b ˙˙ *  b θ +  b ψ =  0                   (14.7.2)
                                                                   *
                                                             ˙ *
                                                      1     2    3
                        Instead of seeking simultaneous solutions to these equations we could have eliminated
                       one of the dependent variables, leaving a single equation of higher order for the other
                                                                        ψ
                       variable. Specifically, suppose we solve Eq. (14.7.1) for  ˙ * , giving us:
                                                   ψ =−(aa    θ ) ˙˙*  −(a a  θ )  *           (14.7.3)
                                                    ˙ *
                                                          1  2     3  2
                       Then, by differentiating, we have:

                                                    ˙
                                                   ψ =−(aa    θ ) ˙˙  −(a a  θ ) ˙˙*           (14.7.4)
                                                              ˙˙*
                                                    ˙˙ *
                                                          1  2     3  2
                       Also, by differentiating Eq. (14.7.2), we have:

                                                       ˙
                                                       ψ +
                                                                  ψ =
                                                             ˙˙*
                                                     b ˙˙ *  b θ +  b ˙ *  0                   (14.7.5)
                                                      1     2    3
                       Finally, by substituting from Eqs. (14.7.3) and (14.7.4), we obtain (after simplification):
                                              a b θ + ( ab + a b − ab θ ) ˙˙* +  ab θ =  0     (14.7.6)
                                                 ˙˙
                                                                           *
                                                 ˙˙*
                                               1 1    3 1  1 3  22      33
                        To solve Eq. (14.7.6), let θ  have the form:
                                               *
                                                          θ =Θ e λt                            (14.7.7)
                                                                *
                                                           *
   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529