Page 334 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 334

Managing Conflict in the Small Group         317


                      Recap: A Quick Review

                          ometimes resolution of conflict within a group or between groups simply does not
                      Soccur. When principled negotiation fails, there are alternatives.
                       1.  The group leader can step in and with structured mediation try to show group
                         members how they can select an alternative through compromise. If a stalemate
                         still ensues, members are left with other alternatives.
                       2.  When integrative solutions are not found after repeated attempts, then members
                         can vote. Although not the best way to break a stalemate, it may be the only way
                         to move on.
                       3.  The group leader can step in and force an alternative by making the decision for
                         the group.
                       4.  Third-party arbitrators can be brought in to select an alternative. These individuals
                         are brought in when the leader and the group believe that all else has failed.





                     QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW

                     Lori, Tony, Kevin, Diedre, and Chris worked through a    3.  What are the substantive and affective conflicts
                     lot of conflict to reach their goal of selecting their univer-  between them? How are they interrelated?
                     sity’s speaker series.                        4.  How do their conflict styles clash? What are the
                                                                      patterns of their tactics? What kinds of conse-
                      1.  How can you apply the definition of conflict to
                        their case? How was it expressed? How were they   quences occur in light of these patterns?
                        interdependent with each other? What were the    5.  How could each member better follow the ethical
                        scarce rewards and incompatible goals? Who is   principles for disagreement?
                        interfering with whom?                     6.  How could you advise them to redirect their confron-
                      2.  Who appear to be the innovative deviants? How   tational efforts along more principled negotiation?
                        could their conversation change to show better    7.  If their negotiation failed to produce a speaker list,
                        innovative deviance?                          which alternative would be best to select in an effort
                                                                      to break their stalemate? Why?



                     KEY TERMS

                     Test your knowledge of these key terms in this chapter. Definitions can be found in the Glossary.

                     Accommodation                 Compromise                    Process conflict
                     Avoidance                     Conflict                      Relationship conflict
                     Coalition                     Deviate                       Task conflict
                     Collaboration                 Facework
                     Competition                   Principled negotiation













          gal37018_ch11_291_320.indd   317                                                              3/28/18   12:38 PM
   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339