Page 336 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J

Managing Conflict in the Small Group 319

in Small Groups,” Speech Monographs, 41 (1974): 29. Renee Meyers and Dale Brashers, “Influence
413–20. Processes in Group Interaction,” in The Handbook
16. Thameling and Andrews, “Majority Responses,” of Group Communication Theory & Research, ed.
475–502. Lawrence Frey (Thousand Oaks: CA, 1999): 298.
17. Mark K. Covey, “The Relationship Between Social 30. Roderick I. Swaab, Katherine W. Phillips, Daniel
Skill and Conflict Resolution Tactics.” Paper Diermeier, and Victoria Husted Medvec, “The Pros
presented at the annual convention of the Rocky and Cons of Dyadic Side Conversation in Small
Mountain Psychological Association, Snowbird, Groups: The Impact of Group Norms and Task
Utah, 1983. Type,” Small Group Research, 39 (2008): 372–90.
18. Rick Garlick and Paul A. Mongeau, “Argument 31. Behfar, Mannix, Peterson, and Trochim, “Conflict
Quality and Group Member Status as Determinants in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences
of Attitudinal Minority Influence,” Western Journal of Process Conflict.”
of Communication, 57 (Summer 1993): 289–308. 32. Linda L. Putnam, “Conflict in Group Decision
19. Renee Meyers, Dale Brashers, and Jennifer Hanner, Making,” in Communication and Group Decision
“Majority-Minority Influence: Identifying Argumen- Making, eds. Randy Y. Hirokawa and Marshall Scott
tative Patterns and Predicting Argument-Outcome Poole (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986): 175–96.
Links,” Journal of Communication, 50 (2000): 3–30. 33. Behfar, Mannix, Peterson, and Trochim, “Conflict
20. Kristen Behfar, Elizabeth Mannix, Randall Peterson, in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences
and William Trochim, “Conflict in Small Groups: of Process Conflict.”
The Meaning and Consequences of Process 34. Ibid.
Conflict,” Small Group Research, 42 (2011): 127–76. 35. Lindred L. Greer, Karen A. Jehn, and Elizabeth
21. Guetzkow and Gyr, “An Analysis of Conflict,” A. Mannix, “Conflict Transformation: A Longitudi-
367–82; Behfar, Mannix, Peterson, and Trochim, nal Investigation of Intragroup Conflict and the
“Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Moderating Role of Conflict Resolution,” Small
Consequences of Process Conflict.” Group Research 39 (3) (2008): 278–302.
22. Kerwin, Doherty, and Harman, “It’s Not Conflict, 36. Elizabeth Hobman, Prashant Bordia, Bernd Irmer,
It’s Differences of Opinion: An In-Depth Examina- and Artemis Chang, “The Expression of Conflict in
tion of Conflict in Nonprofit Boards.” Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups,”
23. Guetzkow and Gyr, “An Analysis of Conflict in Small Group Research, 33 (2002): 439–65.
Decision-Making Groups”; Behfar, Mannix, Peter- 37. Ibid.
son, and Trochim, “Conflict in Small Groups: The 38. David H. Jonassen and Hyug II Kwon, “Communi-
Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict.” cation Patterns in Computer Mediated Versus
24. Mahmut Bayazit and Elizabeth Mannix, “Should I Face-to-Face Group Problem Solving,” Educational
Stay or Should I Go? Predicting Team Member’s Technological Research and Development, 49 (March
Intent to Remain in the Team,” Small Group Research, 2001): 35–51.
34 (2003): 290–321; Kerwin, Doherty, and Harman, 39. Ibid. Hobman, Bordia, Irmer, and Chang, “The
“It’s Not Conflict, It’s Differences of Opinion.” Expression of Conflict in Computer-Mediated and
25. Behfar, Mannix, Peterson, and Trochim, “Conflict Face-to-Face Groups.”
in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences 40. Karen Jehn, “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict
of Process Conflict.” Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups,”
26. Roger C. Pace, “Personalized and Depersonalized Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1997): 530–57.
Conflict in Small Group Discussions: An Examina- 41. R. H. Kilmann and K. Thomas, “Developing a
tion of Differentiation,” Small Group Research, 21 Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling
(1990): 79–96. Behavior: The MODE Instrument,” Educational and
27. Roger Fisher and Scott Brown, Getting Together: Psychological Measurement, 37 (1977): 309–25.
Building a Relationship That Gets to Yes (Boston, 42. Marshall Scott Poole and Melissa Dobosh,
MA: Houghton-Mifflin, 1988): 16–23. “ Exploring Conflict Management Processes in Jury
28. Victor D. Wall, Jr., and Linda L. Nolan, “Small Deliberations Through Interaction Analysis,” Small
Group Conflict: A Look at Equity, Satisfaction, and Group Research, 21 (2010): 408–26.
Styles of Conflict Management,” Small Group 43. Hal Witteman, “Analyzing Interpersonal Conflict:
Behavior, 18 (1987): 188–211. Nature of Awareness, Type of Initiating Event,

gal37018_ch11_291_320.indd 319 3/28/18 12:38 PM