Page 346 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 346

Tools for Assessing and Evaluating Groups        329

                     TABLE 12.4  Conflict Management Style Orientation Scale

                      Instructions: Read each statement below and circle the response that you believe best reflects your position
                      regarding that statement. Add the score for each statement according to the instructions at the bottom of the
                      self-assessment.
                      Statement                                                       Scale
                         1.   If someone disagrees with me, I vigorously defend my side of the issue.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        2.  I go along with suggestions from co-workers, even if I don’t agree with them.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        3.   I give and take so that a compromise can be reached.     Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        4.   I keep my opinions to myself rather than openly disagree with people.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        5.   In disagreements or negotiations, I try to find the best possible solution for
                          both sides by sharing information.                          Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        6.  I try to reach a middle ground in disputes with other people.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        7.   I accommodate the wishes of people who have different points of view than
                          my own.                                                     Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                        8.  I avoid openly debating issues where there is disagreement.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                            9.  In negotiations, I hold on to my position rather than give in.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                      10.  I try to solve conflicts by finding solutions that benefit both me and the
                          other person.                                               Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                      11.  I let co-workers have their way rather than jeopardize our relationship.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                      12.  I try to win my position in a discussion.                  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                      13.  I like to investigate conflicts with co-workers so that we can discover
                          solutions that benefit both of us.                          Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                      14.  I believe that it is not worth the time and trouble to discuss my differences
                          of opinion with other people.                               Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always
                      15.  To reach an agreement, I give up some things in exchange for others.  Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Always

                      Scoring: To determine your preference for a particular style, total your score for each item as shown below:
                                            Total:
                      Avoiding: 4, 8, 14    ___________
                      Accommodating: 2, 7, 11   ___________
                      Competing: 1, 9, 12   ___________
                      Compromising: 3, 6, 15   ___________
                      Collaborating: 5, 10, 13   ___________
                     Source: Adapted from items in M. A. Rahim, “A Measure of Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict,” Academy of Management
                     Journal, 26 (June 1983), pp. 368–76; K. W. Thomas and R. H. Kilmann, Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (Sterling
                     Forest, NY: Xicom, 1977), in Steven L. McShane, Canadian Organizational Behavior, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
                     Member and Group Assessment
                     One of the most effective group leaders we know conducts regular assessments of her
                     group. Sometimes, she takes a few moments at the end of the meeting to ask members
                     whether they thought the goals of the meeting were accomplished and what could have
                     been done better. At other times, she distributes a more formal questionnaire asking
                     for specific evaluation of some aspect of the group—problem solving, goal setting, or







          gal37018_ch12_321_352.indd   329                                                              3/28/18   12:38 PM
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351