Page 100 - Earth's Climate Past and Future
P. 100

76      PART II • Tectonic-Scale Climate Change


          Volume = l × w × h
          Surface area = (l × w) × number of faces                                   70
                                                                                    Number of particles  50
                                                                                     60

                                                                                     40
        1m                                                                           30
                              0.5 m                                                  20
                                                      0.25 m
                                                                                     10
                                    0.5
               1 m                  m                                                 1
                                                          0.25 m
                                                                                       6  9 12 15 18 21 24
                                                                                                         2
            1 cube, 6 faces    8 cubes, 48 faces         64 cubes, 384 faces             Total surface area (m )
            Volume = 1 m 3     Total volume = 1 m 3      Total volume = 1 m 3
            Surface area = 6 m 2  Surface area of 1 cube = 1.5 m 2  Surface area of 1 cube = 0.375 m 2
                               Total surface area = 12 m 2  Total surface area = 24 m 2
        FIGURE 4-20 Fragmentation of rock Each time a cube-shaped rock is sliced into smaller
        cubes (with each side half as long as before), the total surface area of rock doubles, even though
        the volume remains the same. (D. Merritts et al., Environmental Geology, © 1997 by W. H. Freeman
        and Company.)



        basin in the Wind River Mountains of Wyoming.       later on. Why would younger glacial deposits weather
        Because all the bedrock in this basin consists of granite,  so much faster?
        the kind of silicate rock most typical of continental  One explanation is that freshly ground rock has more
        crust, this watershed is reasonably representative of the  weatherable material—the kinds of fresh, unweathered
        average response of continental rocks to weathering.  silicate grains that are most vulnerable to the weathering
           The Wind River Mountains have been glaciated     process. These vulnerable minerals are removed through
        repeatedly over the last several hundred thousand years,  time. Once only the more resistant minerals are left, rates
        and each glaciation has left deposits of unsorted debris  of weathering are slower.
        (moraines) in the foothills of the valleys below. Because  Another part of the explanation relates to the effect
        some of the older deposits have not been overridden by  of grain sizes on weathering (see Figure 4-20). Finer
        later glacial advances, undeformed moraines of various
        ages (from 200 to 130,000 years) can be found in the
        same valley.
           The Wind River moraines provide an opportunity
                                                                                     Soils on glacial moraines
        to quantify the amount of weathering of ground-up
                                                                                     Very old weathered soils
        debris that is identical in composition but differs widely
        in age. The extent of weathering is determined by ana-
        lyzing soils that have subsequently developed on the
        moraines. The soils gradually lose their major cations
                     +1
                 +1
                          +2
            +2
        (Mg , Na , K , Ca , and others) during the chemical
        weathering process. The cumulative amount of chemi-  Rate of weathering
        cal weathering that has occurred since each moraine
        was deposited can be determined by measuring the total
        loss of these cations. Dividing this total amount of
        weathering by the time elapsed since the moraine was
        deposited yields the average rate of chemical weathering  0         100,000          200,000
                                                                      Time of moraine exposure (years)
        over that entire interval.
           The Wind River deposits show a rapid (exponential)  FIGURE 4-21 Weathering and exposure time Glacially
        decrease in the mean rate of weathering versus time of  eroded and fragmented granite weathers quickly soon after
        exposure (Figure 4-21). The younger moraines have   deposition but much more slowly 100,000 years later.
        average rates of weathering that are at least a factor of  (Adapted from J. D. Blum, “The Effect of Late Cenozoic
        100 faster than the older ones. The older moraines also  Glaciation and Tectonic Uplift on Silicate Weathering Rates,” in
        weathered much faster during a brief interval after their  Tectonic Uplift and Climate Change, ed. W. F. Ruddiman [New York:
        deposition, but they then weathered much more slowly  Plenum Press, 1997].)
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105