Page 99 - Earth's Climate Past and Future
P. 99

CHAPTER 4 • Plate Tectonics and Long-Term Climate  75


        4-7 Initial Evaluation of the BLAG Spreading           The uplift weathering hypothesis starts from a dif-
        Rate Hypothesis                                     ferent perspective. It asserts that the global mean rate of
                                                            chemical weathering is heavily affected by the availabil-
        Unfortunately, the predictions of the BLAG hypothesis  ity of fresh rock and mineral surfaces for the weathering
        cannot be directly tested over most of the geologic past  process to attack, and proposes that this exposure effect
        because no ocean crust older than 175 Myr exists to use  can override the combined effects of the climate-related
        for calculating past spreading rates. All older crust has  factors both locally and globally.
        been subducted in ocean trenches. Half of the crust that  A simple example of the importance of rock expo-
        formed 50 Myr ago has already been destroyed by     sure is shown in Figure 4-20. We start with a large cube
        rapid subduction under western South America (see   of rock with six surfaces consisting of squares 1 m
        Figure 4-17) and by the total disappearance of ocean  across, each having a surface area of 1 m . This rock
                                                                                                2
        crust in a former tropical seaway (“Tethys”) by subduc-  cube has a total surface area of 6 m , calculated from the
                                                                                         2
        tion and collision along the southern coast of Asia.  total areas of the six sides.
           Most reconstructions suggest that the global mean   Next we slice this cube into halves along all three of its
        spreading rate was faster 100 Myr ago than it is at pre-  axes. This slicing creates eight smaller cubes, each 0.5 m
        sent, but this issue has recently become a point of   on a side, so that each side has a surface area of 0.25 m .
                                                                                                          2
        contention that will be revisited in the next two chap-  The total surface area of these smaller cubes is 12 m :
                                                                                                      2
        ters. If this conclusion holds up to future scrutiny, the
        BLAG theory predicts that the rate of input of CO to       (8 cubes) × (6 sides each) × (0.25 m of
                                                                                                 2
                                                    2
        the atmosphere should have been higher 100 Myr ago                 surface area per side)
        than it is today (Table 4-2). This prediction agrees with
        geologic evidence of a warmer climate 100 Myr ago,     Note that simply cutting the large cube into smaller
        including the absence of large polar ice sheets. We will  cubes has doubled the surface area of the rock without
        revisit this important issue in the next two chapters.  changing its volume, at least for the imaginary laser-
                                                            sharp cut assumed in this example. The fragmentation
        Tectonic Control of CO Removal:                     has created more exposed surface area for the weather-
                                 2                          ing process to attack.
        Uplift-Weathering Hypothesis                           The process can be continued to finer grain sizes

        A second hypothesis that attempts to explain how plate  with similar results. Ten sequential halvings of the rock’s
        tectonic processes control atmospheric CO  levels   dimensions will produce over 1 billion cubes each 1 mm
                                                2
        emerged from work by the marine geologist Maureen   on a side, about the same size as grains of sand on a
        Raymo and her colleagues in the late 1980s. Parts of  beach. Together these tiny cubes have a total surface
                                                                                                 3
        this concept date back to work by the geologist T. C.  area 1000 times larger than the original 1-m block, yet
        Chamberlain a century ago. The  uplift weathering   they still retain the same total volume. Fragmentation to
        hypothesis proposes that chemical weathering is the  even smaller sizes will expose still more surface area.
        active driver of climate change rather than a negative  With over 1000 times more surface area to act on,
        feedback that moderates climate change.             chemical weathering would increase by a factor of 1000
                                                            or more. This large an increase of weathering far
        4-8 Rock Exposure and Chemical Weathering           exceeds the combined changes estimated to result from
                                                            changes in temperature, precipitation, and vegetation.
        The BLAG hypothesis emphasizes change in CO
                                                      2     Clearly the climate-related factors are not the only
        delivery to the atmosphere by seafloor spreading, and it  processes to consider in evaluating chemical weathering.
        assumes that removal of CO by chemical weathering
                                 2
        responds only to climate-related changes in tempera-  4-9 Case Study: The Wind River Basin of Wyoming
        ture, precipitation, and vegetation. Although these fac-
        tors do affect chemical weathering (Chapter 3), they are  Direct evidence of the importance of rock exposure in
        not the only processes that do.                     chemical weathering comes from a study of a drainage



          TABLE 4-2 Evaluation of the BLAG Spreading Rate (CO ) Input Hypothesis
                                                                    2
          Time (Myr ago)      Ice sheets present?  Spreading rate?              Hypothesis supported?
          100                 No                  Faster (?)                    Yes (?)
          0                   Yes                 Slower (?)                    Yes (?)
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104