Page 185 - Earth's Climate Past and Future
P. 185

CHAPTER 9 • Insolation Control of Ice Sheets  161


        and reacts slowly to changes in the heating applied,  period of a cycle is the interval of time separating suc-
        changes in water temperature lag behind changes in  cessive peaks or successive valleys. In this example, the
        intensity of the heat source.                       phase lag of ice volume behind summer insolation rep-
           Ice sheets have the same lagging response to sum-  resents one-quarter of the cycle length.
        mer insolation (Figure 9–8 bottom) but on a much       The same relationship can be applied to the separate
        longer time scale. As summer insolation declines from a  ice volume responses driven by the insolation cycles of
        maximum value, ice begins to accumulate. The rate at  orbital tilt and precession. At the orbital tilt cycle, the
        which ice volume grows reaches a maximum when sum-  ice volume response would have the same regular sine
        mer insolation has fallen to its lowest value because  wave shape as the summer insolation signal, but it
        summer ablation is at a minimum at that time. Later, as  would lag behind it by one-quarter of the 41,000-year
        summer insolation begins to increase, the ice sheet con-  wavelength or about 10,000 years (Figure 9–9A). At the
        tinues to grow for a while longer because insolation val-  precession cycle, the ice volume response would again
        ues are still relatively low. The ice sheet does not reach  lag insolation by one-quarter of its 23,000-year length,
        its maximum size until insolation crosses the value that  or just under 6000 years. The ice volume response at
        initiates net ice ablation. As a result, the maximum in  this cycle also shows the same amplitude modulation
        ice volume lags thousands of years behind the minimum  as the precession insolation signal (Figure 9–9B). As
        in summer insolation.                               we will see later, the actual lags of the ice sheets behind
           As summer insolation continues to increase, the rate  the solar forcing are large but not quite a full quarter
        of ablation increases (see Figure 9–8 bottom). When  wavelength.
        insolation reaches its maximum value, the rate of abla-
        tion also reaches its maximum. Again, however, the  9-3 Delayed Bedrock Response beneath Ice Sheets
        minimum in ice volume does not occur at the insolation
        maximum because falling insolation values still remain  As ice sheets grow, so does the pressure of their weight
        high enough to melt even more ice for thousands of  on the underlying bedrock. Although the density of
                                                                                   3
        years. Later, about halfway through the drop in insola-  solid ice (just under 1g/cm ) is much lower than that of
        tion, ice volume reaches its maximum value and then  the underlying rock (about 3.3 g/cm ), ice sheets can
                                                                                            3
        starts to decrease in a regime of increasing ablation.  reach thicknesses in excess of 3000 m, equivalent to the
        This relationship can be described by the equation  weight of 1000 m of rock. This load is enough to
        shown in Box 9–1.                                   depress the underlying bedrock far beneath its level
           The persistent delay in ice volume relative to sum-  when no ice sheets existed.
        mer insolation shown in Figure 9–8 (bottom) is the     One way to visualize this process is a thought experi-
        phase lag between the two cycles. Remember that the  ment in which an ice sheet 3.3 km thick is instantaneously




                              BOX 9-1  LOOKING DEEPER INTO CLIMATE SCIENCE
                                   Ice Volume Response to Insolation

            he dependence of ice volume on summer insolation  resulting rate of ice volume change, which depends on the
          Tcan be expressed by this equation:               inverse of the value of T, or 1/T.
                                                               The second factor controlling the rate of ice volume
                             d(I)  1  (S–l)                 change is the term S – I, which is a measure of the degree of
                            ——— = ——
                             d(t)  T                        disequilibrium (offset) between the summer insolation forc-
                             d(I)                           ing signal (S) and the ice volume response (I). Conceptually,
          where I is ice volume,  ———  is the rate of change of ice
                             dt                             the disequilibrium can be thought of in this way: the ice vol-
          volume per unit of time (t),  T is the response time of   ume response (I) is constantly chasing after the insolation
          the ice sheet (in years), and  S is the summer insolation  forcing signal (S), but it never catches up to it. For example,
          signal.                                           when insolation is at a minimum, ice volume is growing at its
             This equation specifies that the rate of change of ice  fastest rate toward its maximum value, but has not yet got-
          volume with time is a function of two factors. One factor  ten to that value. When ice volume finally does reach its
          is T, the response time of the ice sheets, measured in  maximum size, the insolation curve has already turned and
          thousands of years. The equation specifies that the larger  risen halfway toward its next maximum, causing the ice vol-
          the time constant T of ice response, the slower will be the  ume curve to reverse direction and shrink.
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190