Page 381 - Earth's Climate Past and Future
P. 381

CHAPTER 19 • Future Climatic Change  357


        many millennia. Part of the anthropogenic warming   now-overdue glaciation is underway (Chapter 15). In the
        will persist as long as this tail end of the excess CO  future, humankind will probably be weighing the merits
                                                      2
        pulse lingers in the atmosphere.                    of engineering a warmer or a colder Earth.
           One technological idea for avoiding adding huge
        amounts of CO to the atmosphere is to pipe the excess  Epilogue
                     2
        industrial CO into the ocean or into old oil fields. As
                    2
        with many technological solutions, cost is a major issue.  Humans have been responsible for three major alter-
        Many CO -emitting sites lie far from the ocean or from  ations of Earth’s natural state. The first was the mass
                 2
        oil reservoirs, and some of the CO would have to be  extinction of large mammals by late Stone Age peoples
                                       2
        piped hundreds to thousands of miles at considerable cost.  near 50,000 and again near 12,500 years ago. The sec-
        In addition, CO sent directly into the ocean will increase  ond was the clearing of the forests of southern Eurasia
                     2
        the acidity of the ocean even faster than present rates.  during the last several millennia to open up land for
           The atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen has sug-    agriculture. The third and largest has been the wide
        gested that sulfate aerosols could be used to offset some  range of industrial era changes that have further altered
        or all of the CO warming. He proposed that very large  Earth’s surface during the past two centuries. Humans
                      2
        amounts of sulfate aerosols be added to the stratosphere  now move more debris (rock and sediment) than the
        to simulate the effects of volcanically emitted aerosols in  combined action of all Earth’s rivers, glaciers, and winds.
        blocking solar radiation and cooling climate. By adding  Estimated future changes in climate will be on a scale
        enormous amounts of aerosols, we might be able to cool  comparable to the largest natural changes of the past.
        Earth’s climate even in the absence of effective action in  The projected 5°C warming from the 4 × CO emissions
                                                                                                  2
        reducing emission of CO and other greenhouse gases.  scenario would be equivalent to the amount of cooling at
                             2
           Because gravity pulls stratospheric aerosols down into  the most recent glacial maximum 20,000 years ago. The
        the troposphere within a few years (where they are soon  projected 2.5°C warming from the 2 × CO emissions
                                                                                                 2
        removed by rainfall), sustaining a high enough concentra-  scenario would amount to half of the glacial maximum
        tion to offset global warming would require a constant  cooling. We are now ~0.7°C of the way into this huge
        supply of aerosols, by one estimate half a million tons of  new experiment in transforming our planet. Unless tech-
        aerosols per year. Several means of delivering the aerosols  nology or extreme conservation efforts intervene, Earth
        have been proposed: balloons, artillery shells fired into  is headed toward a warmer future at rates that are
        space, a fleet of high-flying planes larger than any modern  unprecedented in its 4.5-billion-year history.
        commercial airliners. By one estimate, the cost would be
        hundreds of millions of dollars per year, but even this
        price would be far lower than the expense in sequestering  Key Terms
        CO after burning. One of several possible drawbacks is  methane clathrate (p. 347)  ocean acidification (p. 351)
           2
        the fact that the additional sulfates would add to the acid-
        ification of the ocean and of terrestrial environments.
           Another recent suggestion is to use genetic manipu-  Review Questions
        lation to develop microbes that feed on CO and turn it
                                             2               1. What factors will determine how much CO
        into some form of carbon other than greenhouse gases.                                       2
        If such a transformation turns out to be possible, we   humans add to the atmosphere in the future?
        could get rid of one greenhouse gas and turn it into  2. Where will all the excess carbon eventually go?
        another one that is a source of energy.
           In the distant future, most of the pulse of excess CO  3. In what way will the future CO warming be like
                                                                                          2
                                                      2         and unlike past CO warmings?
        will have disappeared into the ocean, and climate will have             2
        cooled back toward its natural level (see Figures 19–3 and  4. In a 2 × CO world, how many trends under
                                                                          2
        19–5) but probably not to a glaciation. Part of the excess  way in recent decades are likely to continue?
        CO pulse will linger in the atmosphere for tens of thou-
           2                                                 5. In a 4 × CO world, where will ice of any kind still
        sands of years and keep climate too warm for new ice              2
        to accumulate on North America or Eurasia. Ongoing      be found on Earth?
        methane emissions from irrigated areas and landfills will  6. Will future temperature changes be readily apparent
        also prevent cooling to the point of glaciation.        to the average person? Why or why not?
           In a world where climate can be manipulated,
        humankind will face the question of what “natural” is. By  7. What are the disadvantages in drastically reducing
        consensus, “natural” might be the climate that existed  our industrial emissions of sulfur and carbon?
        just prior to the industrial era. An equally viable view is  8. Yes or no: Do you think that future global
        that the true natural state would be one in which the   warming is a major concern?
   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386