Page 31 - Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
P. 31

Educating the Engineer of 2020:  Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11338.html


                14                             EDUCATING THE ENGINEER OF 2020


               change is reaching a critical mass and that coordinated action on a broad
               scale may be possible and effective.
                   Efforts to realign engineering education, of varying scopes, have
               taken place in almost every decade of the twentieth century, beginning
               in the early 1900s. (See the brief history provided by Bruce Seely in
               Appendix A.) As a student of this history, Seely suggests points of conti-
               nuity between this initiative and efforts in past eras, including:

                   •   an explicit desire to increase the public recognition of the role
                       of engineering professionals, to enhance the social status and
                       prestige of the community by depicting a compelling vision of
                       engineering;
                   •   a  clear recognition of the need to attract and sustain the interest
                       of students from the groups continually and currently
                       underrepresented in the study and practice of engineering;
                   •   the complex relationship between academic engineering, the
                       corporations and large industrial concerns that employ the great
                       majority of engineering graduates, and the nation’s economy;
                   •   a  continuous and sometimes contentious debate about the role
                       of liberal studies (humanistic and social science courses) in pre-
                       paring the professional engineer;
                   •   a  persistent struggle to arrive at balance in the several curricular
                       elements in the undergraduate engineering program—the sci-
                       entific base, the technical core, professional and general educa-
                       tion; and
                   •   lurking concerns about institutional inertia, whether in the
                       form of faculty resistance to change or the challenges of mov-
                       ing the “battleship” of the modern research university.


                   He also suggests that present efforts are characterized by some posi-
               tive points of departure with past efforts, particularly:


                   •   a  motivation to think ahead as a community, to step beyond
                       the immediacy of the moment and the challenges of the present
                       to imagine the future;
                   •   the active engagement of experts from the field of management
                       in the first phase of the Engineer of 2020 Project, informing
                       the process of gathering facts, of forecasting future conditions,








                      Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36