Page 103 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 103

86                  Chapter 4

                                      When low and high uncertainty- avoidance individuals come together, they may
                                   threaten or frighten each other.  Uncertainty avoidance affects preferences for
                                                             25
                                                                              26
                                     leadership styles, conformity, and discussion processes.  Cultures high in uncertainty
                                   avoidance rely on clear rules, consistently enforced, with the leader expected to struc-
                                   ture the work of the group and behave autocratically. They prefer structure and clear
                                   procedures. In contrast, low uncertainty avoidance cultures prefer democratic leader-
                                   ship approaches. High uncertainty- avoidance cultures value predictability and
                                     security; nonconformist behavior threatens this predictability. Conformity to the
                                   leader and group opinion is the norm for high avoidance cultures, whereas dissent
               Masculinity (as applied
               to culture)         and disagreement are tolerated, even encouraged, in low avoidance cultures.
               The quality of
               cultures that value   Masculinity– Femininity
               assertiveness and
               dominance.          Masculinity refers to cultures that value stereotypical masculine behaviors such as
                                   assertiveness and dominance.  This is contrasted with femininity, referring to cul-
                                                           27
                                   tures that value behaviors such as nurturing and caring for others. Masculine cultures,
               Femininity (as applied   which include Japan, Austria, Mexico, and Venezuela, prize achievement, accumula-
               to culture)         tion of wealth, aggressiveness, and what we would call “macho” behavior. Feminine
               The quality of      cultures, which include the Scandinavian countries, The Netherlands, and Thailand,
               cultures that value   value interpersonal relationships, nurturing, service to and caring for others, particu-
               nurturing and caring   larly the poor and unfortunate. The United States is a moderately masculine culture.
               for others.            Lustig and Cassotta observe that masculinity and femininity affect a number of
                                                              28
                                   preferences related to small groups.  Masculine cultures are more comfortable with a
                                   controlling, directive leadership. Such cultures value objectivity and control, qualities
               Low- Context        exhibited by authoritarian leaders. Feminine cultures, which value relationships and
               Communication
                                   subjectivity, prefer a more participative, democratic leadership style. Stereotypical
               Communication       masculinity, with its emphasis on assertiveness and ambition, does not value confor-
               wherein the primary   mity highly. In contrast, femininity, which stereotypically values cooperation and
               meaning of a
               message is carried   group- based decision making, expects and values conformity. Finally, social roles
               by the verbal or    between men and women are more clearly differentiated in high masculine cultures.
               explicit part of the   Males are more likely to undertake task- related roles and females, socioemotional
               message.            ones. This affects the roles performed in small groups, including who will compete for
                                   the leadership role and whether women will be accepted in leadership and other high-
                                   status positions.
               High- Context
               Communication
               Communication       Low- and High- Context Communication
               wherein the primary   The final cultural characteristic we will consider is low- versus high- context communi-
               meaning of a        cation.  In low- context communication, the primary meaning of a message is carried
                                        29
               message is          by the verbal, or explicit, part of the message, whereas in high- context communication,
               conveyed by features   the primary meaning is conveyed by certain features of the situation. In other words,
               of the situation or   in a high- context culture, what is not said may be more important in determining
               context instead of the
               verbal, explicit part of   meaning than what is said. In high- context cultures, words aren’t needed because
               the message.        members of the culture share the same understandings and can take much for granted.
                                   For example, one of our students who is Roman Catholic said she was completely









          gal37018_ch04_075_108.indd   86                                                               3/28/18   12:35 PM
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108