Page 149 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J

132 Chapter 5

NOTES

1. Frank LaFasto and Carl E. Larson, When Teams 12. James Joseph A. Diliberto, “A Communication
Work Best: 6,000 Team Members and Leaders Tell Study of Possible Relationships Between
What It Takes to Succeed (Thousand Oaks, CA: Psychological Sex Type and Decision-Making
Sage, 2001): 1–32. Effectiveness,” Small Group Research, 23 (August
2. Susan E. Jackson, “Team Composition in 1992): 379–407.
Organizational Settings: Issues in Managing a 13. Dean Kazoleas and Bonnie Kay, “Are
Diverse Work Force,” in Group Process and Argumentatives Really More Argumentative? The
Productivity, eds. Stephen Worchel, Wendy Wood, Behavior of Argumentatives in Group Deliberations
and Jeffry A. Simpson (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, over Controversial Issues.” Paper presented at the
1992): 138–73. Speech Communication Association Conference,
3. A. Paul Hare, “Roles, Relationships, and Groups New Orleans, LA, November 1994.
in Organizations: Some Conclusions and 14. James C. McCroskey and Virginia P. Richmond,
Recommendations,” Small Group Research, 34 “Communication Apprehension and Small Group
(April 2003): 123–54. Communication,” in Small Group Communication:
4. Herbert A. Thelen, Dynamics of Groups at Work A Reader, 5th ed., eds. Robert S. Cathcart and Larry
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954): 187. A. Samovar (Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, 1988):
5. Phillip E. Slater, “Contrasting Correlates of Group 405–19.
Size,” Sociometry, 21 (1958): 129–39. 15. K. W. Hawkins and R. A. Stewart, “Effects of
6. Robert F. Bales et al., “Channels of Communication Communication Apprehension on Perceptions of
in Small Groups,” American Sociological Review, 16 Leadership and Intragroup Attraction in Small
(1952): 461–68. Task-Oriented Groups,” Southern Communication
7. J. A. Schellenberg, “Group Size as a Factor in Journal, 57 (1991): 1–10.
Success of Academic Discussion Groups,” Journal 16. Richard E. Porter and Larry A. Samovar,
of Educational Psychology, 33 (1959): 73–79; “Communication in the Multicultural Group,” in
E. B. Smith, “Some Psychological Aspects of Small Group Communication: Theory and Practice,
Committee Work,” Journal of Abnormal and Social 7th ed., eds. Robert S. Cathcart, Larry A. Samovar,
Psychology, 11 (1927): 73–79; Richard B. Powers and Linda D. Henman (Boston: McGraw-Hill,
and William Boyle, “Common Dilemma Choices in 1996): 306–15.
Small vs. Large Groups.” Paper presented at 17. Dominic A. Infant and Charles J. Wigley III,
American Psychological Association, Anaheim, “Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model
CA, August 1983. and Measure,” Communication Monographs, 53
8. Albert V. Carron and Kevin S. Spink, “The Group (1986): 61–67.
Size–Cohesion Relationship in Minimal Groups,” 18. Rebecca B. Rubin and F. F. Jordan, “Effects of
Small Group Research, 26 (February 1995): 86–105. Instruction on Communication Apprehension and
9. Susan A. Wheelan, “Group Size, Group Communication Competence,” Communication
Development, and Group Productivity,” Small Education, 46 (1997): 104–14.
Group Research, 40 (April 2009): 247–62. 19. Susan L. Kline, Cathy L. Hennen-Floyd, and
10. Randy Y. Hirokawa, Daniel DeGooyer, and Kathleen M. Farrell, “Cognitive Complexity and
Kathleen Valde, “Using Narratives to Study Task Verbal Response Mode Use in Discussion,”
Group Effectiveness,” Small Group Research, 31 Communication Quarterly, 38 (1990): 350.
(October 2000): 573–91. 20. Ibid., 357–58.
11. Brian H. Spitzberg, “Interpersonal Competence 21. Robert J. Ellis and Steven F. Cronshaw, “Self-
in Groups,” in Small Group Communication: A Monitoring and Leader Emergence: A Test of
Reader, 6th ed., eds. Robert S. Cathcart and Larry Moderator Effects,” Small Group Research, 23
A. Samovar (Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, (1992): 114–15; see also Robert J. Ellis, Raymond
1992): 431. S. Adamson, Gene Deszca, and Thomas F. Cawsey,

gal37018_ch05_109_134.indd 132 3/28/18 12:35 PM