Page 48 - Electrical Safety of Low Voltage Systems
P. 48

Mathematical Principles of Electrical Safety      31

























                                  FIGURE 3.2 Safety offered by a circuit breaker.

                                     We can then use the negative exponential distribution to quantify the
                                  safety of the generic ith protective measure as follows:

                                                           N − F(t)   −  i t
                                                     S i (t) =     = e                  (3.2)
                                                              N
                                  where   i represents the failure rate, defined as the mean number of
                                  failures per unit-time, for example, years, of the ith protective mea-
                                                                         2
                                  sure (e.g., the failure rate for a circuit breaker is 0.0052 failure per
                                  year). We will, herein, assume a constant failure rate, that is, the fail-
                                  ure associated with the steady-state period of the life of the protective
                                  component. The failures, therefore, will be considered as due to ran-
                                  dom causes and not due to infant mortality or deterioration caused
                                  by the age of the PM.
                                     Safety as offered by a circuit breaker to a piece of equipment is
                                  shown in Fig. 3.2.
                                     If n protective measures are simultaneously deployed, we need to
                                  superpose their protective effects in order to calculate the total safety
                                  achieved by the item against electric shock. If all the n measures must
                                  simultaneously operate to ensure safety, the protection system is de-
                                  fined as “serial.” If, on the contrary, all PMs must fail in order for
                                  safety to fail, the system is defined as parallel or redundant.
                                     Safety for serial and parallel systems can be, respectively, evalu-
                                  ated through Eqs. (3.3) and (3.4):


                                               S S (t) =  n    S i (t) = S 1 (t) ... S n−1 (t)S n (t)  (3.3)
                                                      1
                                     S P (t) = 1 −  n    [1 − S i (t)] = 1 − [1 − S 1 (t)] ... [1 − S n (t)]  (3.4)
                                                1
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53