Page 201 -
P. 201

178    9. Elliptic and Hypergeometric Functions

        Proof. These formulas follow easily from the definitions. For example, calculate

                                        1                       1
                                                  −3

               ℘ (λz,λL) =−2                  = λ   (−2)
                                    (λz − λω) 3              (z − ω) 3
                             λω∈λL−0                    ω∈L−0
                           −3

                        = λ  ℘ (z, L).
           Now we can make precise how the isomorphism h in (4.3) relates to isomor-
        phisms between complex tori and the corresponding elliptic curves.

        (4.7) Theorem. For two equivalent lattices L and L = λL we have the following
        commutative diagram where h is defined in (4.3):
                                        λ −1
                                 C/λL −−−−→ C/L
                                               
                                              h
                                                
                                  h
                                         f

                                 E (C) −−−−→ E(C).
                                                            2
                                                                  3
                              2
                                   3
        The curve E is defined by y = 4x −g 2 x−g 3 ,the curve E by y = 4x −g x−g ,



                                                                     2    3
        and the isomorphism f by the admissible change of variable with u = λ.
                                       2
                                                                   2
        Proof. The relation ℘(λ −1 z, L) = λ ℘(z,λL) corresponds to xf = λ x under
                                  3
                                                              3
         f , the relation ℘ (λ −1 z, L) = λ ℘ (z,λL) corresponds to yf = λ y under f ,the


                        4
                                                   4
        relation g 2 (L) = λ g 2 (λL) corresponds to g 2 = λ g , and the relation g 3 (L) =
                                                    2
         6
        λ g 3 (λL) corresponds to g 3 = λ g . This proves the theorem.
                                  6
                                    3
                                                        3               3
        (4.8) Remark. From 3(3.5) the discriminant of the cubic x + ax + b is Disc(x +
                           3
                      2
                                                             3
        ax + b) = 27b + 4a and it is also the discriminant of (2x) + a(2x) + b or
                                   3
                                                        2
          3
                                                            3
        4x + ax + b/2. Hence Disc(4x − g 2 x − g 3 ) = 4(27g − g ). For a lattice L
                                                        3   2
                                                   3
                                             2
        the corresponding elliptic curve defined by y = 4x − g 2 (L)x − g 3 (L) we defne
                              2
                    3
         (L) = g 2 (L) − 27g 3 (L) and
                                           g
                                          3 2 (L) 3
                                  j(L) = 12      .
                                             (L)
        Then j(L) = j(E) where E is the elliptic curve defined by the Weierstrass equation
         2
                                                  4
                3
                                                               12
                                            3
                                                                       3
                                                          3
        y = 4x − g 2 (L)x − g 3 (L).Since g 2 (L) = (λ g 2 (λL)) = λ g 2 (λL) and
                12
         (L) = λ  (λL),wehave j(L) = j(λL).
        (4.9) Summary Remark. The j-function has the very basic property that it clas-

        sifies elliptic curves up to isomorphism, that is, two curves E and E over C are

        isomorphic if and only if j(E) = j(E ). This function will also come up in an
        essential way in Chapter 11 on modular functions.
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206