Page 711 - Encyclopedia of Business and Finance
P. 711

eobf_S  7/5/06  3:21 PM  Page 688


             Standard & Poor’s 500


             service and greater volumes of traffic, dramatically  STANDARD-BASED
             increase productivity, improve profitability from once  WORK PERFORMANCE
             anemic levels, and improve safety—while at the same time
             sharply lowering rates for shippers” (Association of Amer-  Forces in the workplace such as organizational values,
             ican Railroads, 2003).                           work cultures, and business goals shape the structures,
                                                              strategies, and human resource processes of most success-
                Until 1995 the regulating agency for the railroads was
             the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). The intent  ful organizations. One change emerging from these forces
                                                              is the development and implementation of work stan-
             of the Staggers Rail Act was to replace federal regulation
                                                              dards. Work standards deliver specific goals to employees,
             with market competition. The ICC was charged by Con-
             gress in the Staggers Rail Act to promote rail-to-rail com-  helping them understand exactly what is expected of them
             petition. Unfortunately, the ICC did not fully succeed in  in order to earn a fair and equitable pay for their job per-
             its charge.                                      formance. These work standards also provide employers
                                                              with a reliable performance appraisal system. This com-
                The ICC’s successor, the Surface  Transportation  pensation process is referred to as standard-based work
             Board (STB) of the U.S. Department of Transportation,
                                                              performance.
             was created by Congress in 1995.  The STB retained
                                                                 Standard-based work performance came into vogue
             authority to set maximum rates or take other actions if a
             railroad was found to have market dominance or to have  in the 1990s, when many U.S. organizations began using
                                                              it in some way. Pay-for-performance, at-risk compensa-
             engaged in competitive behavior. The STB is also respon-  tion, and merit pay are other terms for standard-based
             sible for railroad mergers, consolidations, and track age  work performance. Standard-based pay is a form of com-
             rights. Railroads largely control their pricing; changes,  pensation known as incentive pay. With an incentive pay
             however, must be approved by the STB and, if they are,
                                                              plan, pay increases are granted to employees based on
             the railroad is not subject to antitrust regulations.
                                                              their rated performance in a given period. Pay increases
                Since its beginnings in the 1830s, “the U.S. freight  are granted with the goal of motivating future, and, it is
             rail industry has seen many market improvements, mak-
                                                              hoped, more productive, performance. Some organiza-
             ing today’s industry competitive against other modes of  tions view standard-based work-performance compensa-
             transport and vital to the economic health” (Association  tion as a way to change behavior; others view it as a reward
             of American Railroads, 2003) of the U.S. economy. The  mechanism. Clearly for many, “incentive compensation is
             Staggers Rail Act of 1980 has helped that happen.
                                                              the motivational tool that drives employees to meet their
             SEE ALSO Transportation                          goals which in turn drives the company to new levels of
                                                              success” (Human Resource Department Ltd.).
                                                                 Indeed, an effective compensation strategy is crucial
             BIBLIOGRAPHY
             Association of American Railroads. (2003). A trip through rail-  to achieve organizational goals. A key element in compen-
               road history. Retrieved December 10, 2005, from  sation strategy is monitoring and improving employee
               http://www.tomorrowsrailroads.org/industry/history.cfm  performance and productivity. Compensation & Perfor-
             Association of American Railroads. Policy and Economic  mance Management stated that among other things, an
               Department. (2005, June). Why the rail reregulation debate is  effective compensation strategy helps a firm recruit and
               important. Retrieved December 10, 2005, from   retain valuable employees, ensure equitable pay levels, use
               http://www.aar.org/About_AAR/about_aar.asp
                                                              compensation as a motivator, and manage compensation
             Deregulations anniversary. (2005, October 10). Traffic World,  costs.
               269(41), 8.
             Vantuono, W. C. (2005, July 7). Twenty-five years after Staggers:
               New challenges, huge opportunities. Railroad Age, 206,  STANDARD-BASED WORK-
               22–26.                                         PERFORMANCE PLAN
                                                              REQUIREMENTS
                                                              Key to success with standard-based work performance in
                                                Phyllis Bunn
                                                              an organization is to have the appraisal system backed by
                                               Laurie Barfitt
                                                              a clear sense of corporate purpose. Thus, designing and
                                                              implementing a new compensation program and appraisal
                                                              system requires a great deal of planning in deciding what
             STANDARD & POOR’S                                action management wants to elicit from employees. Obvi-
                                                              ously, organizational and corporate culture and manage-
             500                                              ment styles will determine how to implement the changes
             SEE Stock Indexes                                in compensation. Generally, priority may be given to cor-


             688                                 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE, SECOND EDITION
   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716