Page 441 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Chemical Engineering
P. 441

P1: GLQ/GUB  P2: GQT Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN012I-591  July 26, 2001  15:54







              Pollution Prevention from Chemical Processes                                                607

              2. Generate useful technical information about       Quick-opening access doors
                methodologies and technologies for reducing        A dryer which serves as part of the enclosure to
                pollution, which could help the U.S. EPA assist other  minimize the enclosure size
                companies implementing pollution prevention/waste     VOC concentration monitors which control air flow to
                minimization programs.                           each dryer stage to maintain the dryers at 25–40% of
              3. Evaluate and identify potentially useful refinements  the LEL (lower explosive limit)
                to the U.S. EPA and DuPont methodologies for       Damper controls which maintain a constant exhaust
                analyzing and reducing pollution and/or waste    rate from the enclosure to ensure a slight vacuum
                generating activities.                           within the enclosure.
                The business leadership was initially reluctant to un-  If the pressroom had been used as the enclosure, the
              dertake the program, and was skeptical of the return to  amount of ventilation air requiring treatment would have
              be gained when compared against the resources required.  been close to 200,000 scfm. Instead, the use of the en-
              After completing a few of the projects, however, the busi-  closure and the LEL monitors reduced the air flow to
              ness leadership realized that the methodology identified  the adsorber to 48,000 scfm. This resulted in an invest-
              revenue-producing improvements with a minimum use of  ment savings for the carbon adsorber of approximately
                                                                                                    2
              people resources and time, both of which were in short  $5,000,000. The installed cost of the 1700-ft enclosure
                                                                                      2
              supply.                                           was only $80,000, or $47/ft . Knowing the investment re-
                The pollution prevention program assessed 15 manu-  quired to treat the entire 200,000 scfm provided a clear
              facturing processes and attained the following results:  incentive for the business to reduce air flow at the source
                                                                through segregation.

               A 52% reduction in waste generation.

               Total capital investment of $6,335,000.
                                                                C. Waste Stream Analysis—Nonaqueous
               Savings and earnings amounting to $14,900,000 per
                                                                   Cleaning
               year.
                                                                In a sold-out market, a DuPont intermediates process was
              Clearly, this is a very attractive return on investment, while  operating at 56% of peak capacity. The major cause of
              also cutting waste generation in half. No matter which  the rate limitation was identified as poor decanter opera-
              methodology was used, the EPA’s or DuPont’s, the re-  tion. The decanter recovered a valuable catalyst, and the
              sults were the same. The key to the site’s success was fol-  poor operation was caused by fouling from catalyst solids.
              lowing a structured methodology throughout the project  Returning the process to high utility required a 20-day
              and allowing creative talents to shine in a disciplined  shutdown. During the shutdown, the vessel was pumped
              way.                                              out and cleaned by water washing. The solids and hy-
                                                                drolyzed catalyst were then drummed and incinerated. A
                                                                waste stream analysis identified three cost factors: the vol-
              B. Incentive for Pollution Prevention—Gas Flow
                                                                ume of wastewater that had to be treated, the cost of the
                 Rate Reduction
                                                                lost catalyst, and the incineration cost.
              AprintingfacilityinRichmond,Virginia,usesrotogravure  An analysis of the process and ingredients indicated
              printing presses to produce consumer products packaging  that the decanter could instead be bypassed and the pro-
              materials. Typical solvents used are toluene, isopropyl ac-  cess run at a reduced rate while the decanter was cleaned.
              etate, acetone, and methyl ethyl ketone. Driven by the U.S.  A process ingredient was used to clean the decanter, en-
              EPA’s new source performance standards for the surface  abling recovery of the catalyst ($200,000 value). The use
              coating industry, the site installed a permanent total en-  of the process ingredient in place of water cut the clean-
              closure (PTE) around a new press so as to attain a 100%  ing time in half, and that, along with continued running of
              VOC capture efficiency. Leaks from the hot air convec-  the process, eliminated the need to buy the intermediate
              tion dryers and other fugitive emissions from the coating  on the open market. The results were a 100% elimination
              operation are captured in the press enclosure and routed,  of a hazardous waste (125,000 gallons per year) and an
              along with the dryer exhaust, to a carbon adsorber for re-  improved cash flow of $3,800,000 per year.
              covery. Overall VOC removal efficiency for the enclosure
              and recovery system is greater than 95%. While many
                                                                D. Process Analysis—Replace Solvent with
              rotogravure press installations use the total pressroom as
                                                                   a Process Intermediate, Product, or Feed
              the enclosure, this facility was one of the first to install a
              separate, smaller enclosure around the new press. Notable  At a DuPont site, organic solvents used in the manufac-
              features of the enclosure include the following:  ture of an intermediate monomer were incinerated as a
   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446