Page 371 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd InOrganic Chemistry
P. 371

P1: GTQ/GUU  P2: GTQ Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN011H-551  July 25, 2001  18:33






               690                                                                              Periodic Table (Chemistry)
















               FIGURE 13 The capping of one lone pair of S by an oxygen atom
               via one I-bond. The two representations are essentially equivalent,
               differing only in the selection of the reference configuration.

                                                                 FIGURE 14 Bimodal T/I-bonding in Diborane. The four conven-
               by a pair of dots, while two oxygen lone pairs associate  tionally drawn B H bonds are, according to the colored periodic
               with the vacant 3p AO. We have a total of four I-bonds.  table, T-bonds. However, the electrons responsible for the aggre-
               This species is effectively the “I-analogue” of the CF +  gation of the two ligands are connected via four HT arrows. Since
                                                           3
               “T-prototype.”                                    one pair of arrows represents a single I-bond, there are a total of
                                                                 two I-bonds and four T-bonds.
                 One can extend the approach described above to pro-
               duce the most likely formulae of transition metal oxides.
               To do so, one takes transition metals in their low-spin  which can enter into hydrogen abstraction reactions much
               electronic configurations, caps valence pairs by pairs of  like the OH radical. Is it operationally significant to con-
               oxygen dots, and associates valence holes with oxygen  sider metal and semimetal oxides as sources of incipient
               lone pairs. Thus, the well-known oxidizer CrO 2 Cl 2 can be  oxygen radicals? Mayer (1998) has made a first step in an-
               formulated as Cr with three pairs plus three holes (the va-  swering this question, with the ultimate answer requiring
               lence space is 3d plus 4s), with each Cr pair tying up two  an investigation of the mechanism of oxidation by main
               ligand dots and each hole tying up two ligand lone pairs.  group oxides, e.g., XeO 3 .
               Thus, this inorganic molecule has effectively two oxygen  The BDEs of a series of fluorides that start with LiF and
               atoms and two chlorine atoms linked to chromium by six  end with FF are as follows (in kcal/mol): LiF 137; BF 181;
               I-bonds.                                          CF 127; NF 92; OF 55; FF 37. It is evident that BF stands
                 Borane clusters were also key stimulants for the new  out of the correlation. Now, the increase in the BDE in
               VB interpretation. Boron is a gateway atom ambiguous  going from LiF to BF can be attributed to the increasing
                                                                  +
               about T- and I-bonding, advantageously combining both  x . Also, the decrease in going from BF to CF can be at-
               mechanisms as well as being tolerant to the expression of  tributed to the introduction of a three-electron pi antibond
               either one mechanism acting alone, generating a fantastic  between one odd carbon electron and one fluorine lone
               array of diverse chemical systems. An examination of the  pair. However, if this were all that was involved, the sub-
               structural, experimental, and computational literature has  sequent addition of antibonding electrons in going from
               produced the outlook presented in Deciphering the Chem-  CF to FF would have comparable consequences, and this
               ical Code: Bonding Across the Periodic Table. Bridging is  is clearly not the case. One possible interpretation is that
               a consequence of either I- or E-bonding, never T-bonding  BF is actually a molecule with a very favorable I-bond as
               (which favors electron pair segregation). Diborane, shown  illustrated below.
               in Fig. 14, is an example of mixed T/I-bonding having four  Here, we can glimpse why I-bonding is intrinsically
               T- and two I-bonds.                               superior to T-bonding, i.e., why the famous “covalent
                 As discussed before, we can envision transition metal  bonding” actually represents a restriction. It can be seen
               oxides as binding through a low-spin metal electronic con-
               figuration with each oxygen atom acting through a pair of
               dots plus one lone pair to produce the maximum number
               of I-bonds permissible by the valence (n − 1)d/ns space
               of the metal. For example, OsO 4 has four tetrahedrally
               arranged Os pairs capped by four oxygens each acting by
               two dots plus one lone pair. Disengagement of one of the
               two oxygen dots at the expense of I-bond reduction (a form
               of promotional energy) generates an oxygen monoradical              SCHEME 4
   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376