Page 9 - Subyek Encyclopedia - Encyclopedia of Separation Science
P. 9

4   I / AFFINITY SEPARATION / Derivatization


           The matching pair must be identiRed, and one    afRnity method is not restricted to protein separ-
           of them isolated in a pure form. Covalent bond-  ations; nucleic acids and whole cells can also be
           ing onto an inert matrix in a stable manner must  separated.
           always allow the ‘docking’ surface of the protein to  The simplicity of the chromatographic process is
           be positioned to make it available to the target pro-  shown in Figure 1. The ligand of interest, covalently
           tein. The whole also has to be achieved at an accept-  bonded onto the inert matrix, is contained in the
           able cost.                                      column, and a solution containing the target (the
             This technique has resulted in many successful ap-  ligate) is passed through the bed. The ligand recog-
           plications, often using antibodies as the afRnity  nizes the ligate to the exclusion of all other molecules,
           medium   (immunoafRnity  chromatography),  but  with the unwanted materials passing through the col-
           large scale separations using these ‘natural’ ligands  umn packing while the ligate is retained. Once the
           are largely restricted by cost and regulatory reasons.  bed is saturated with the target molecule (as mea-
           Although immunoafRnity chromatography is still  sured by the breakthrough point), contaminating spe-
           widely practised, in recent years the evolution of  cies are washed through, followed by collection of the
           design technologies has provided powerful new ap-  target molecule as a very pure fraction using an
           proaches to mimic protein structures, resulting in the  eluting buffer solution. Finally, the column is
           development of synthetic ligands able to work in  cleansed from any strongly adsorbed trace materials,
           harsh operational environments and at low cost.  usually by regeneration with a strong alkali or acid,
                                                           making it available for many more repeat runs. An
                                                           outstanding advantage of the afRnity process is
           The Af\nity Process
                                                           an ability to concentrate very dilute solutions while
           The afRnity method is critically dependent upon  stabilizing the captured protein once adsorbed onto
           the ‘biological recognition’ existing between species.  the column. Many of the in-demand proteins manu-
           By permanently bonding onto an inert matrix a mol-  factured by genetically engineered microorganisms
           ecule (the ligand) that speciRcally recognizes the mol-  are labile, allowing only minute quantities to be pres-
           ecule of interest, the target molecule (the ligate) can  ent in the fermentation mix before they begin to
           be separated. The technique can be applied to any  deteriorate. An ability to capture these very small
           biological entity capable of forming a dissociable  quantities while stabilizing them in the adsorbant
           complex with another species. The dissociation con-  phase results in maximization of yield, making mass-
           stant (K d ) for the interaction reSects the comp-  ive savings in total production costs.
           lementarity between ligand and ligate. The optimal  Although the technical processing advantages are
           range of K d for afRnity chromatography lies be-  clear there is a major difRculty in the appli-
           tween 10  4  and 10  mol L  . Most biological   cation of afRnity chromatography as understood
                                8
                                       1
           ligands can be used for afRnity purposes provid-  by most practitioners today. Most ligands described
           ing they can be immobilized, and once immobilized  in Table 1 suffer from two primary disadvan-
           continue to interact successfully with their respective  tages: a lack of stability during use; and high
           ligates. The ligand can be naturally occurring, an  cost. Fortunately these problems have now been over-
           engineered macromolecule or a synthetic molecule.  come, and afRnity chromatography is now accep-
           Table 1 provides some examples of immobili-     ted as the major separations technology for
           zed ligands used to purify classiRed proteins. The  proteins.



           Table 1 Affinity ligands and purified proteins
           Immobilized ligand                       Purified protein

           Divalent and trivalent metal ion         Proteins with an abudance of his, tryp and cys residues
           Lectins                                  Glycoproteins, cells
           Carbohydrates                            Lectins
           Reactive dyes                            Most proteins, particularly nucleotide-binding proteins
           Nucleic acids                            Exo and endonucleases, polymerases, other nucleic acid-binding proteins
           Amino acids (e.g. lys, arg)              Proteases
           Nucleotides, cofactors substrates and inhibitors  Enzymes
           Proteins A and G                         Immunoglobulins
           Hormones, drugs                          Receptors
           Antibodies                               Antigens
           Antigens                                 Antibodies
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14