Page 225 - Energy from Toxic Organic Waste for Heat and Power Generation
P. 225
Economic Factors for Toxic Waste Management 203
[8] Barik D, Murugan S. An artificial neural network and genetic algorithm optimized
model for biogas production from co-digestion of seed cake of karanja and cattle dung.
Waste Biomass Valoriz 2015;6:1015–27.
[9] Barik D, Kumar A, Murugan S. Effect of compression ratio on combustion performance
and emission characteristic of a direct injection diesel engine fueled with upgraded
biogas−karanja methyl ester−diethyl ether port injection. Energy Fuel 2018;32:
5081–9.
[10] Barik D, Murugan S. Effects of diethyl ether (DEE) injection on combustion perfor-
mance and emission characteristics of Karanja methyl ester (KME)–biogas fueled dual
fuel diesel engine. Fuel 2016;164:286–96.
[11] Barik D, Murugan S. Assessment of sustainable biogas production from de-oiled seed cake
of karanja-an organic industrial waste from biodiesel industries. Fuel 2015;148:25–31.
[12] Barik D, Vijayaraghavan R. Effects of waste chicken fat derived biodiesel on the per-
formance and emission characteristics of a compression ignition engine. Int J Ambient
Energy 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1451370.
[13] Ruiza D, San Miguel G, Corona B, Gaitero A, Domínguez A. Environmental and eco-
nomic analysis of power generation in a thermophilic biogas plant. Sci Total Environ
2018;633:1418–28.
[14] Sušnik J. Data-driven quantification of the global water-energy-food system. Resour
Conserv Recycl 2018;133:179–90.
[15] Ghisellini P, Ripa M, Ulgiati S. Exploring environmental and economic costs and
benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector.
A literature review. J Clean Prod 2018;178:618–43.
[16] Shmelev SE, Powell JR. Ecological–economic modelling for strategic regional waste
management systems. Ecol Econ 2006;59:115–30.