Page 322 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 322

Chapter I. Improvement of transverse fracture  toughness with interface control   303








                 where the coefficients are:



                                                                                   (7.4)

                       (1 + s4 - 2Vi)( 1 + Vi)            Ei
                   s2 =                  + (1 + Vf)(l - 2vf)-   ,
                             s4 - 1                      Em



                            t2
                   s4=  (I+--)   ?


               E,  v  and a are the Young’s modulus, Poisson ratio and CTE, respectively, and the
               subscript i refers to the interlayer or coating. The residual stress at the fiber/matrix
               interface,  Cai7 for the composite without an interlayer can be obtained for Ei  = E,,
               vi  = v,  and ai  = a,  in Eq. (7.2). Figs. 7.14 and 7.15 present the results which are
               calculated using the properties of a CFRP given in Table 7.3, and the stresses are
               normalized with the compressive stress oa, = -10.7MPa  which is obtained without
               an  interlayer.  The  residual  stresses,  o,i  and  oci, decrease  parabolically  with
               increasing interlayer thickness when the coating is more compliant than the matrix.
               Further reductions in these residual stresses were realized with increasing CTE of the
               interlayer, mi. This result is explained by the fact that the compressive stress induced
                by the shrinkage of the stiff matrix is effectively balanced by the greater shrinkage of
               the compliant interlayer. This means that the thicker the coating layer, the greater is
               the counterbalance against matrix shrinkage.
                 When the Young’s modulus of the interlayer is the same as the matrix material,
               Le., Ei/&  = 1, and ai is high, oai is almost equivalent to that obtained without an
               interlayer, regardless of the interlayer thickness, t/a. On the contrary, aci decreases
               drastically with increasing interlayer thickness and mi,  becoming negative (Le. tensile
               stress) at the right-hand bottom comer of Fig. 7.14(b). It is worth noting that aai is
               always  greater  than  oci in  absolute terms,  regardless  of  Young’s  modulus  ratio,
               Ei/E,,  the difference increasing with  ai  and t/a. This finding agrees well with the
               results from finite element analysis shown in Fig. 7.11 such that the interfacial shear
               stress  is  always  higher  at  the  fiber/coating interface  than  at  the  coating/matrix
               interface for a constant external stress. The Young’s modulus of the interlayer is a
               very important parameter  which governs the magnitude of  the residual stresses in
               the composites. Both the residual stresses, oai and oci, increase significantly within a
               very small range of low modulus ratio, Ei/E,,  followed by a more gradual increase
               with further increase in Ei/E,,  depending on CTE and thickness of the interlayer. In
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327