Page 584 - Engineering Electromagnetics, 8th Edition
P. 584

566                ENGINEERING ELECTROMAGNETICS

                                     which we shall integrate throughout the volume enclosed by the boundary surfaces
                                     specified:

                                                 ∇ · [(V 1 − V 2 )∇(V 1 − V 2 )] dν
                                               vol

                                                                                             2
                                                ≡    (V 1 − V 2 )[∇ · ∇(V 1 − V 2 )] dν +  [∇(V 1 − V 2 )] dν  (D.1)
                                                   vol                          vol
                                        The divergence theorem allows us to replace the volume integral on the left side of
                                     the equation with the closed surface integral over the surface surrounding the volume.
                                     This surface consists of the boundaries already specified on which V 1b = V 2b , and
                                     therefore

                                           ∇ · [(V 1 − V 2 )∇(V 1 − V 2 )] dν =  [(V 1b − V 2b )∇(V 1b − V 2b )] · dS = 0
                                         vol                           S
                                        One of the factors of the first integral on the right side of (D.1) is ∇ · ∇(V 1 − V 2 ),
                                        2
                                     or ∇ (V 1 −V 2 ), which is zero by hypothesis, and therefore that integral is zero. Hence
                                     the remaining volume integral must be zero:

                                                                          2
                                                               [∇(V 1 − V 2 )] dν = 0
                                                             vol
                                        There are two reasons why an integral may be zero: either the integrand (the
                                     quantity under the integral sign) is everywhere zero, or the integrand is positive in
                                     some regions and negative in others, and the contributions cancel algebraically. In this
                                                                               2
                                     case the first reason must hold because [∇(V 1 − V 2 )] cannot be negative. Therefore
                                                                         2
                                                               [∇(V 1 − V 2 )] = 0
                                     and
                                                                ∇(V 1 − V 2 ) = 0
                                        Finally, if the gradient of V 1 −V 2 is everywhere zero, then V 1 −V 2 cannot change
                                     with any coordinates, and
                                                               V 1 − V 2 = constant
                                     If we can show that this constant is zero, we shall have accomplished our proof. The
                                     constant is easily evaluated by considering a point on the boundary. Here V 1 − V 2 =
                                     V 1b − V 2b = 0, and we see that the constant is indeed zero, and therefore
                                                                   V 1 = V 2
                                     giving two identical solutions.
                                                                                             2
                                        The uniqueness theorem also applies to Poisson’s equation, for if ∇ V 1 =−ρ ν /
                                          2
                                                           2
                                     and ∇ V 2 =−ρ ν / , then ∇ (V 1 −V 2 ) = 0as before. Boundary conditionsstill require
                                     that V 1b − V 2b = 0, and the proof is identical from this point.
                                        This constitutes the proof of the uniqueness theorem. Viewed as the answer to a
                                     question, “How do two solutions of Laplace’s or Poisson’s equation compare if they
                                     both satisfy the same boundary conditions?” the uniqueness theorem should please
                                     us by its ensurance that the answers are identical. Once we can find any method of
                                     solving Laplace’s or Poisson’s equation subject to given boundary conditions, we
                                     have solved our problem once and for all. No other method can ever give a different
                                     answer.
   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589